MyFox
 

Cruiser's Blog

by Cruiser from DFW Metroplex

Last Post 38 days, 6 hours Ago


After extensive research on my part since Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" film was released, there are some facts out there that blow this film and the Global Warming pundants out of the water.

1) The Atmosphere has cooled .13 degrees C since 1979.

2) Our oceans have cooled 3 degrees since 2005.

3) Scientists have taken specific date ranges (not all the historical data) and generated computer models based on that limited data to calculate a trend. Trends without all historical data creates false results.

4) All historical data models show that the high temps peaked in 1940, since then the temps have been trending down.

The best, undisputable source of accurate "Global Warming" I have found is S. Fred Singer. He is an  Atmospheric Physicist, Professor Emertus of Environmental Sciences at the University of Virginia, Former Director of  the U.S. Weather Satellite Service.

If interested, you must read his short interview. Go to: www.ourcivilisation.com/aginatur/moregw.htm-4k  p>

 

7 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 7
Page 1 of 1
Cruiser read my blog
Aug 27, 2008 | 4:21 PM

I tried to link up on the above link and it wouldn't work.
Google: Global Warming Myth? and the first web site at the top is the one I have referenced.

TexasGuyDFW read my blog view my photos
Aug 28, 2008 | 10:50 AM

I vote for "myth".

I took geology in college. Even in geology 101 we learned the earth has gone through many cooling and warming cycles, long before humans ever had any impact on the planet.

Cruiser read my blog
Aug 28, 2008 | 12:41 PM

They have used warming/cooling cycles to justify the age of the earth, etc. Strange though, removing ice core samples from Upper Victoria Glacier at 140M (459 ft.) indicates a two thousand year span. 250 ft (76M)of ice removed to retrieve a P38 Lightning from Greenland in 2001 (Glacier Girl, History Channel) which is 50 years old. Do the Math!

NativeTX read my blog
Aug 29, 2008 | 11:18 AM

I have always believed the time frames to be inaccurate and, considering temperatures hav not been taken all over the globe for centuries to have complete date, there is no way scientist know what they know.

I call it bad science. theory stacked on theory stacked on theory - no theory is proven but they use it as a foundation.

TexasTruBlu read my blog view my photos
Aug 31, 2008 | 9:32 AM

Global Warming folks absolutely HATE it when you bring up the fact that for the last 200 years, some part of Texas has been in a drought. I posted the list awhile back. Also, it upsets them when you mention the Dust Bowl in the 1930's and the Great Hurricane in Galveston in 1900. The problem is that the Global Warming True Believers can't conceive of a cycle that is outside the short realm of their own lifetimes. Our geologic cycles are in the tens of thousands of years. There's no reason to think our weather trends are any shorter, especially when you consider that it was warm enough to grow grapes in Medieval England and then there was a period known as the "Little Winter" where most of Europe was very cold. They don't know, but they want money and this is the only way they can get it.

pmo2375 read my blog
Sep 1, 2008 | 11:05 PM

The earth's climate goes in cycles. About two thousand years ago (during the days of the Roman empire) the earth's climate greatly warmed. Then it cooled again. About one thousand years after the Roman empire the earth's climate greatly warmed again. So much so that there could be farming on Greenland. During the nineteenth century there was what is known as the "Mini Iceage". One of the warmest years on record was actually back in the mid 1930's. Scientists who have their brains intact also say the tilt of the earth's axis changes from time to time, so when this happens the polar ice caps may shrink one one side they are growing on the other side. Global warming proponents are no more than fear mongers trying to get votes for the democrats.

scottythecomic read my blog view my photos
Sep 2, 2008 | 6:34 AM

While this may sound harsh, I simply don't care. That is to say, I believe the Global Warming is indicative of an environazi religion, melding humanism and a twisted "earth first" blend of thinking.

I simply trust the Lord. God is not so unwise so as to allow feeble man to destroy his creation.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Cruiser

Born in Dallas, got out as soon as I could! Live in Fort Worth, a much kinder place to live. Favorite hobby- Riding my motorcycles (2). Favorite food - Bar-B-que (with my homemade sauce). Married to the Greatest woman in the world. Have 3 sons -all grown and am proud of all 3 for their ethics and morals and common sense. Libra through and through and will discuss everything from religion to politics to the universe. Active in my Church - choir, acting, serviing, etc. Philosophy of Life: Enjoy life to it's fullist!

Member Since: 12/27/2006