Dak413's Blog

An editorial from the London Daily Mail on Obama's Victory

Tue, 01/06/2009

 

Obama's Victory

A victory for the hysterical Oprah Winfrey, the mad racist preacher Jeremiah Wright, the mainstream media who abandoned any sense of objectivity long ago, Europeans who despise America largely because they depend on her, comics who claim to be dangerous and fearless but would not dare attack genuinely powerful special interest groups. A victory for Obama-worshippers everywhere. A victory for the cult of the cult. A man who has done little with his life but has written about his achievements as if he had found the cure for cancer in between winning a marathon and building a nuclear reactor with his teeth. Victory for style over substance, hyperbole over history, rabble-raising over reality.

A victory for Hollywood, the most dysfunctional community in the world. Victory for Streisand, Spielberg, Soros and Sarandon. Victory for those who prefer welfare to will and interference to independence. For those who settle for group think and herd mentality rather than those who fight for individual initiative and the right to be out of step with meager political fashion.

Victory for a man who is no friend of freedom. He and his people have already stated that media has to be controlled so as to be balanced, without realizing the extraordinary irony within that statement. Like most liberal zealots, the Obama worshippers constantly speak of Fox and Limbaugh, when the vast bulk of television stations and newspapers are drastically liberal and anti-conservative. Senior Democrat Chuck Schumer said that just as pornography should be censored, so should talk radio. In other words, one of the few free and open means of popular expression may well be cornered and beaten by bullies who even in triumph cannot tolerate any criticism and opposition.

A victory for those who believe the state is better qualified to raise children than the family, for those who prefer teachers' unions to teaching and for those who are naively convinced that if the West is sufficiently weak towards its enemies, war and terror will dissolve as quickly as the tears on the face of a leftist celebrity.

A victory for social democracy even after most of Europe has come to the painful conclusion that social democracy leads to &nbs p; mediocrity, failure, unemployment, inflation, higher taxes and economic stagnation. A victory for intrusive lawyers, banal sentimentalists, social extremists and urban snobs.

Congratulations America!

An editorial from the London Daily Mail on Obama's Victory

Tue, 01/06/2009

 

Obama's Victory

A victory for the hysterical Oprah Winfrey, the mad racist preacher Jeremiah Wright, the mainstream media who abandoned any sense of objectivity long ago, Europeans who despise America largely because they depend on her, comics who claim to be dangerous and fearless but would not dare attack genuinely powerful special interest groups. A victory for Obama-worshippers everywhere. A victory for the cult of the cult. A man who has done little with his life but has written about his achievements as if he had found the cure for cancer in between winning a marathon and building a nuclear reactor with his teeth. Victory for style over substance, hyperbole over history, rabble-raising over reality.

A victory for Hollywood, the most dysfunctional community in the world. Victory for Streisand, Spielberg, Soros and Sarandon. Victory for those who prefer welfare to will and interference to independence. For those who settle for group think and herd mentality rather than those who fight for individual initiative and the right to be out of step with meager political fashion.

Victory for a man who is no friend of freedom. He and his people have already stated that media has to be controlled so as to be balanced, without realizing the extraordinary irony within that statement. Like most liberal zealots, the Obama worshippers constantly speak of Fox and Limbaugh, when the vast bulk of television stations and newspapers are drastically liberal and anti-conservative. Senior Democrat Chuck Schumer said that just as pornography should be censored, so should talk radio. In other words, one of the few free and open means of popular expression may well be cornered and beaten by bullies who even in triumph cannot tolerate any criticism and opposition.

A victory for those who believe the state is better qualified to raise children than the family, for those who prefer teachers' unions to teaching and for those who are naively convinced that if the West is sufficiently weak towards its enemies, war and terror will dissolve as quickly as the tears on the face of a leftist celebrity.

A victory for social democracy even after most of Europe has come to the painful conclusion that social democracy leads to &nbs p; mediocrity, failure, unemployment, inflation, higher taxes and economic stagnation. A victory for intrusive lawyers, banal sentimentalists, social extremists and urban snobs.

Congratulations America!

Yeah, the the Border Gaurds, Campean  and Ramos,  just had their sentences commuted , it' not a full pardon , but maybe that will come, let's hope so !

it wasn't a pardon becuz the US attorney is a personal friend of Bush's, I hope and will give Obama cudo's if he is the first US Attorney to get the AXE.

Global Cooling Headed Our Way
Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:53 AM

By: Philip V. Brennan

 

Excuse me while I gloat, but it's fun to say I told you so.

 

Americans are surprised to learn that President-elect Obama's choice to be his global warming czar, one Carol Browner, was listed as one of 14 leaders of a socialist group's Commission for a Sustainable World Society, which calls for "global governance" and says rich countries must shrink their economies to address climate change, according to the Washington Times.

 

A global warming militant a socialist? How can that be? Well, it can be because the whole purpose of the AGW scam is nothing less than a covert movement to create a world socialist order.

 

The fact that the woman Barack Obama chose to oversee the effort to combat the global warming fantasy appears to be a believer in the socialist doctrine should come as no surprise — I warned that the hidden motivation of whole climate change scam is the creation world socialist order 12 years ago. Nobody listened.

 

In my 1997 Wednesday on the Web series on the global warming hoax — The Iceman Cometh — I wrote the following: ''behind all the rhetoric about global warming and mankind's culpability for this impending disaster is a shrewdly planned campaign to inflict a lot of socialistic restrictions on our cherished freedoms.

 

“Environmentalism, in short, is the last refuge of socialism. It is no accident that one of those in the forefront of the global warming alarmists is one Michael Gorbachev, an unrepentant socialist who appears to believe if you can't lick 'em one way, find another. Among his cohorts are the governing elites of the socialist European nations . . .

“The debate over global warming is the most crucial Americans have faced since the Cold War ended with the demise of what now appears to have been the first phase in the ongoing attempt to build a world socialist order. That attempt was brutal and overt — the communists made no secret about their plans to bury us, by force if necessary.

 

"The latest power grab by the left is far more subtle — and covert. And it must be met with the same vigor that energized America in its battle with world communism because if those promoting the global warming panic prevail, the outcome will be much the same as it would have been had we lost the Cold War. Only the commissars will differ. It will be the Gores instead of the Gorbachevs."

In a later column, I quoted Britain's professor David Bellamy as writing in Britain's Daily Mail that "As a result of their ignorance, the world's economy may be about to divert billions, nay trillions of pounds, dollars and rubles into solving a problem that actually doesn't exist.

 

“The waste of economic resources is incalculable and tragic. The global warming theory prevails principally because it gives the promoters of this classic example of junk science an opportunity to impose all sorts of restrictions on human activity that will help them accomplish their real goal: a global socialist government."

 

Again, nobody listened. Perhaps they will now, thanks to comrade Carol Browner.

 

In my eight-part 1997 series, I also showed how and why we have come to the end of the present interglacial period and I warned that the iceman indeed is knocking on our door. Nobody listened.

 

I asked then, "Cooling? Global refrigeration instead of global barbecuing? You bet. And there's a heck of a lot more solid scientific evidence that what the world is facing is the onset of a new ice age than there is behind the very fragile global warming theory.

 

“Up until the mid-‘70s there was general agreement among researchers, who studied such arcane signs of the far distant past as sedimentary deposits on the ocean floor, that sooner or later a new ice age was in the cards for this planet."

 

Now comes Gregory F. Fegel writing in Pravda Ru that we are on the brink of a new ice age, a revelation that has shocked many Americans but one that I explained 12 years ago in my series The Icemen Cometh.

 

According to Fegal, "The earth is now on the brink of entering another Ice Age, according to a large and compelling body of evidence from within the field of climate science. Many sources of data which provide our knowledge base of long-term climate change indicate that the warm, twelve thousand year-long Holocene period will rather soon be coming to an end, and then the earth will return to Ice Age conditions for the next 100,000 years."

 

Take heed: the final 20 years before the onset of the glaciation process is a period of incredible natural disasters. We are in that period now. Be prepared. The iceman cometh.

 

Now the cats are at last out of the bag. Will anybody listen?

 

Phil Brennan is a veteran journalist and World War II Marine who writes for Newsmax.com. He is editor and publisher of Wednesday on the Web (http://www.pvbr.com) and was Washington columnist, with pen name Cato, for National Review magazine in the 1960s. He is a trustee of the Lincoln Heritage Institute and a member of the Association For Intelligence Officers.

Title: Bush's Achievements: Ten things the president got right
Source: The Standard
URL Source: http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles
/000/000/015/986rockt.asp
Published: Jan 12, 2009
Author: Fred Barnes

 

 

 

The postmortems on the presidency of George W. Bush are all wrong. The liberal line is that Bush dangerously weakened America's position in the world and rushed to the aid of the rich and powerful as income inequality worsened. That is twaddle. Conservatives--okay, not all of them--have only been a little bit kinder. They give Bush credit for the surge that saved Iraq, but not for much else.

He deserves better. His presidency was far more successful than not. And there's an aspect of his decision-making that merits special recognition: his courage. Time and time again, Bush did what other presidents, even Ronald Reagan, would not have done and for which he was vilified and abused. That--defiantly doing the right thing--is what distinguished his presidency.

Bush had ten great achievements (and maybe more) in his eight years in the White House, starting with his decision in 2001 to jettison the Kyoto global warming treaty so loved by Al Gore, the environmental lobby, elite opinion, and Europeans. The treaty was a disaster, with India and China exempted and economic decline the certain result. Everyone knew it. But only Bush said so and acted accordingly.

He stood athwart mounting global warming hysteria and yelled, "Stop!" He slowed the movement toward a policy blunder of worldwide impact, providing time for facts to catch up with the dubious claims of alarmists. Thanks in part to Bush, the supposed consensus of scientists on global warming has now collapsed. The skeptics, who point to global cooling over the past decade, are now heard loud and clear. And a rational approach to the theory of manmade global warming is possible.

Second, enhanced interrogation of terrorists. Along with use of secret prisons and wireless eavesdropping, this saved American lives. How many thousands of lives? We'll never know. But, as Charles Krauthammer said recently, "Those are precisely the elements which kept us safe and which have prevented a second attack."

Crucial intelligence was obtained from captured al Qaeda leaders, including 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, with the help of waterboarding. Whether this tactic--it creates a drowning sensation--is torture is a matter of debate. John McCain and many Democrats say it is. Bush and Vice President Cheney insist it isn't. In any case, it was necessary. Lincoln once made a similar point in defending his suspension of habeas corpus in direct defiance of Chief Justice Roger Taney. "Are all the laws but one to go unexecuted, and the government itself go to pieces, lest that one be violated?" Lincoln asked. Bush understood the answer in wartime had to be no.

Bush's third achievement was the rebuilding of presidential authority, badly degraded in the era of Vietnam, Watergate, and Bill Clinton. He didn't hesitate to conduct wireless surveillance of terrorists without getting a federal judge's okay. He decided on his own how to treat terrorists and where they should be imprisoned. Those were legitimate decisions for which the president, as commander in chief, should feel no need to apologize.

Defending, all the way to the Supreme Court, Cheney's refusal to disclose to Congress the names of people he'd consulted on energy policy was also enormously important. Democratic congressman Henry Waxman demanded the names, but the Court upheld Cheney, 7-2. Last week, Cheney defended his refusal, waspishly noting that Waxman "doesn't call me up and tell me who he's meeting with."

Achievement number four was Bush's unswerving support for Israel. Reagan was once deemed Israel's best friend in the White House. Now Bush can claim the title. He ostracized Yasser Arafat as an impediment to peace in the Middle East. This infuriated the anti-Israel forces in Europe, the Third World, and the United Nations, and was criticized by champions of the "peace process" here at home. Bush was right.

He was clever in his support. Bush announced that Ariel Sharon should withdraw the tanks he'd sent into the West Bank in 2002, then exerted zero pressure on Sharon to do so. And he backed the wall along Israel's eastern border without endorsing it as an official boundary, while knowing full well that it might eventually become exactly that. He was a loyal friend.

His fifth success was No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the education reform bill cosponsored by America's most prominent liberal Democratic senator Edward Kennedy. The teachers' unions, school boards, the education establishment, conservatives adamant about local control of schools--they all loathed the measure and still do. It requires two things they ardently oppose, mandatory testing and accountability.

Kennedy later turned against NCLB, saying Bush is shortchanging the program. In truth, federal education spending is at record levels. Another complaint is that it forces teachers to "teach to the test." The tests are on math and reading. They are tests worth teaching to.

Sixth, Bush declared in his second inaugural address in 2005 that American foreign policy (at least his) would henceforth focus on promoting democracy around the world. This put him squarely in the Reagan camp, but he was lambasted as unrealistic, impractical, and a tool of wily neoconservatives. The new policy gave Bush credibility in pressing for democracy in the former Soviet republics and Middle East and in zinging various dictators and kleptocrats. It will do the same for President Obama, if he's wise enough to hang onto it.

The seventh achievement is the Medicare prescription drug benefit, enacted in 2003. It's not only wildly popular; it has cost less than expected by triggering competition among drug companies. Conservatives have deep reservations about the program. But they shouldn't have been surprised. Bush advocated the drug benefit in the 2000 campaign. And if he hadn't acted, Democrats would have, with a much less attractive result.

Then there were John Roberts and Sam Alito. In putting them on the Supreme Court and naming Roberts chief justice, Bush achieved what had eluded Richard Nixon, Reagan, and his own father. Roberts and Alito made the Court indisputably more conservative. And the good news is Roberts, 53, and Alito, 58, should be justices for decades to come.

Bush's ninth achievement has been widely ignored. He strengthened relations with east Asian democracies (Japan, South Korea, Australia) without causing a rift with China. On top of that, he forged strong ties with India. An important factor was their common enemy, Islamic jihadists. After 9/11, Bush made the most of this, and Indian leaders were receptive. His state dinner for Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in 2006 was a lovefest.

Finally, a no-brainer: the surge. Bush prompted nearly unanimous disapproval in January 2007 when he announced he was sending more troops to Iraq and adopting a new counterinsurgency strategy. His opponents initially included the State Department, the Pentagon, most of Congress, the media, the foreign policy establishment, indeed the whole world. This makes his decision a profile in courage. Best of all, the surge worked. Iraq is now a fragile but functioning democracy.

How does Bush rank as a president? We won't know until he's judged from the perspective of two or three decades. Hindsight forced a sharp upgrading of the presidencies of Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower. Given his achievements, it may have the same effect for Bush.

FAIR USE NOTICE: The above may be copyrighted material, and the use of it on LibertyPost.org may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available on a non-profit basis for educational and discussion purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 USC § 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

straight  from the horse's mouth in His news conference not long ago,

change and reform, may become a campaign slogan , *laughing*

New Texas Law Requires Fire-Safe Smokes Cigarette Likely Started Fatal Fire in Fort Worth After reading  these 2 articles it  strikes me that smoking is being blamed to  justify a law , when it's quite possible the cause was something else like maybe substandard wiring , which  the state   would likely want to  cover up , becuz of liability to them , I know from what i've seen in My own brand new home, wiring in Texas is substandard , with only using  wiring approved  for lights only on outlets , only putting lighter circuit breakers on them , and from  the amount of homes, and some of them new homes, and big new  homes burning,  I can see why and all to save builders money , I've seen  a number of reports of house fires , that  seemed suspicious , and  no cause stated, but if they  find a cigarette butt , it's automatically  blamed on the cigarette , and no further  determination , gotta protect the state, and the builders , and with all the hate for smoking   it is blamed for almost any  kind of health hazard , and saves a lot of investigation  , after smoking  for 48  years, and as much stuff as I'ved burned holes in (falling asleep with  cigarettes, etc. ) and never having a fire, it has  to make me wonder about fire officials and what and who they are  protecting could it be the builders, the state ,for failure to protect the  people  from substandard  wiring, I have  to wonder , it seems ok, to inconvenience Me,  hell, i'm  just a stupid smoker , but some  things have to have some logic behind  it , it couldn't  the fault of bought and paid  for just dumb  politicians, that any one with a degree of some kind could convince them  the sky was falling , could  it ?

cool, bumper sticker  for anyone, that wants one, follow the link <

 

 

 

http://www.discountbookdistributors.com/liberalsgon
ewild2009calendarcd-romandillkeepmygunsstickers.aspx>

Islam: Changing America from Within

Children shout "Allahu akbar!"
Women aren't allowed in public without a male relative. Muslims don't pay interest on financial transactions.
Sounds like a description of daily life in Saudi Arabia, right?
It's actually happening right here in America—
most people just don't know it.

But you can stop it....

Dear Reader,
While our homeland security efforts are focused on preventing terrorist attacks, another jihadist threat is growing here in America—in plain sight.
Everyday, jihadists are waging war on America—right here on our soil. Not through guns and bombs, but by undermining our culture.
Footbaths at publicly-funded universities.
Prayer breaks during the work day for Muslims.
Mosques in airports.
Radical Islamic forces are using our schools, businesses, and even our government to force Muslim practices bit by bit into the public square.
And with every accommodation made in the name of "tolerance" and "diversity," we're one step closer to the jihadists' ultimate goal: an America completely subjugated under Islamic law—just the way Osama bin Laden wants it.

But we can turn the tables on the forces of radical Islam and thwart their attacks....

After thoroughly researching and documenting the threat, an Islamic expert is bravely stepping forward and exposing the threat for what it is....

It's a stealth jihad—the newest and most misunderstood front
in the war for our freedom.

Everyday, radical Islamists are subverting America from within, by gradually Islamizing America through small cultural concessions, like footbaths at universities and mosques in airports. The ultimate goal, the stealth jihadists themselves declare, is nothing less than the adoption of Islamic law in the United States.
Wait a minute. Footbaths at universities and mosques at airports are part of a larger initiative to rule America through Islamic law? If you think this sounds far fetched, keep reading. When you're done, you'll understand the grave danger this stealth jihad poses to America....and how you can stop it.

"Why I'm Exposing the Stealth Jihad
and Refuse to Be Silent..."

~Islamic expert Robert Spencer
Seven years ago on 9/11, suicide bombers declared war on America. They attacked us through unthinkable means—using our own planes and civilians against us. Terror had a new face, and overnight America changed.
Our government overhauled America's airports, intelligence agencies, and security departments to ensure we would never be attacked like that again.
And seven years later we're grateful there has not been another terrorist attack on American soil.
Unfortunately, we've become too complacent. Many Americans have slipped into a September 10th mentality—unaware of the internal threats we face.
Sure, we've been looking abroad to foreign threats and guarding ourselves against domestic terror attacks. But the terrorists changed their tactics and started waging a quiet jihad on America from within our own country. By demanding special privileges for Muslims and calling anyone who objects to this special treatment a racist, jihadists have begun remaking our culture, our public institutions, and our daily lives—slowly acclimating us to Islamic law, which ultimately they want all Americans to obey.

How Did This Happen?
Your House is Our House: Accommodating Islam

After 9/11 something extraordinary happened: we punished radical Islamists abroad, but courted them here in America.

Sadly, many Americans became more afraid of being politically incorrect than of losing their own rights and freedoms. Leftist pundits, politicians, and schools started willingly censoring themselves and giving up our rights to free speech and religion in the name of "tolerance."
And the jihadists realized they could use our politically correct culture and democratic laws against us.

"Thanks to your democratic laws we will invade you;
thanks to our religious laws we will dominate you."
~Muslim authority during an official meeting on Islamic-Christian dialogue

By shrouding their "requests" to accommodate Muslim practices in the context of multiculturalism and civil rights, the stealth jihadists began to subvert us through our own culture.
Less overt than crashing airplanes into buildings, but much more insidious.
First, in our quest to be "politically correct," we changed our rhetoric. Our government declared terrorists should no longer be called "jihadists" because it might be offensive to some non-radical Muslims.
Then we started changing our schools and businesses. Schools started including Islamic holidays in their calendars to be "inclusive" and "multicultural." Businesses like Target said their Muslim workers did not have to touch or ring up meat since pork is unclean under Islamic law.
Soon, these small multicultural concessions became normal and paved the way for larger "accommodations."

Islam In School, At Work, and In Our Government

Now, not only are some schools changing their school calendars, but they are banning pork from cafeterias, segregating classes by sex, and white-washing Islam in textbooks.
Some businesses are structuring prayer breaks into the work day for Muslim employees, and thereby forcing non-Muslim workers to pick up the slack. And in Florida, an employee was fired for eating a bacon, lettuce, and tomato sandwich on the job because she violated a company rule against eating pork products on company premises.
Even our government—in the name of inclusion and political correctness—has allowed stealth jihadists to play a key role in crafting our War on Terror
After reading about and researching these "accommodations" being made in our schools, businesses, government, and other cultural institutions, Islamic expert Robert Spencer realized these were not just isolated events, but part of a grander goal—a stealth jihad.
And he decided to sound the alarm.

Who's Behind the Stealth Jihad?

As you have read, the work that many Muslims in the United States are doing to advance the stealth jihad is already doing significant damage to our schools, businesses, government, and our American culture. But are all Muslims in the United States trying to subvert America through this stealth jihad? Of course not. There are many Muslims in this country who are happy to live in a pluralistic society in which there is no established religion.
But it is no less true that there are untold numbers of Muslims within America, working stealthily and systematically to make the U.S. into an Islamic state, including:

• The Muslim Brotherhood—a shadowy international organization that has given rise to terrorist organizations like Hamas and Al Qaeda. In an official document, a leader of the Muslim Brotherhood said that members "must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying our Western civilization from within."




• The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)—outwardly, it is a mainstream civil rights organization for Muslims. Inwardly, it funds Hamas, and the FBI's former chief of counterterrorism has even said, "CAIR, its leaders, and its activities effectively give aid to international terrorist groups." CAIR's co-founder and former board member insisted that Islam become dominant in the U.S.




• The Muslim Students Association (MAS)—a campus Muslim group with hundreds of chapters across the nation, and a group named as part of the stealth jihad by the Muslim Brotherhood in an internal memorandum. A speaker at a MSA chapter said, "The only relationship you should have with America is to topple it....Eventually there will be a Muslim in the White House dictating the laws of sharia."

After months of intense and in-depth research, Robert Spencer has written a new book unlike any other book ever written on terrorism or Islam. Proving, without a doubt, that the terrorists' tactics have changed, and they are actively attacking—and subverting—America from within.
Spencer also shows how we can stop the stealth jihad, reclaim our already lost freedoms, and turn the tables on the terrorists.
And now, Spencer's controversial exposé, Stealth Jihad: How Radical Islam Is Subverting America without Guns or Bombs is finally being released to the public.
In Stealth Jihad, Spencer does not lay out a glorified conspiracy theory, but instead a carefully constructed argument supported by sound evidence and daily examples of the stealth jihad happening right here on our own soil.
And how are the stealth jihadists getting away with it?

"Using a carefully constructed façade of moderation, those who are trying to advance Islamic law in America are introducing it, bit by bit, into American society and demanding that Americans accommodate it," Spencer says. "They will shout down anyone who objects and label them bigots. But they aren't seeking to protect Muslim's 'civil rights.' They are leading a full-scale effort to transform pluralistic societies into Islamic states, and to sweep away Western notions of legal equality, freedom of conscience, and freedom of speech."

Stealth Jihad will open your eyes to the cultural battles being waged in our schools, places of employment, and government.
Spencer shows that even though most of Western Europe has capitulated to radical Islam's demands, American society can still be saved.

Saving America from the Stealth Jihad

Starting by identifying key leaders and foot soldiers, like the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR, and many more seemingly "moderate" Islamic organizations, Spencer explains why and how these organizations, as well as radical Muslims across the country, are waging war on America without us even knowing it.
Spencer then lays out how the very principles our nation was founded on, such as freedom of religion and speech, as well as leftist notions of "tolerance" and "multiculturalism" are being used against us to break down the cultural threads of America and acclimate us to Islamic law.
Along the way, Spencer reveals 282 pages worth of the increasing number of cultural battles waged—and mostly won— by the stealth jihadists on a daily basis, and how we can turn the war around, including:

• How we can begin to stop the stealth jihad by ending Muslim immigration in the United States




• Why we should make it an act of sedition or solicitation of treason to preach or publish materials that call for the deaths of Americans




• Why taking pride in our culture—not deriding it—will help us take a stand against leftist politicians and pundits who are all to ready to give up our freedoms in the name of "multiculturalism" and "diversity"




• How reclassifying Muslim organizations will thwart the stealth jihadists' attacks




• Why we should call for audits of sovereign wealth funds




• How we can implement existing laws and a 10-step plan, put forth by Congress, to counter the stealth jihad

What one doesn't defend, one loses. We've already lost some of our freedoms, and we've seen the jihadists are willing to go all the way—to give up their lives—in their quest to control ours. For them, no price is too high.
But what about us? How many freedoms and rights will we allow to erode before we stand up and call a halt to this attack?
Across the nation, Islamic and intelligence experts see this stealth jihad happening, and they have applauded Spencer for making it known. For example....

R. James Woolsey: "A Vital Wake-Up Call of a Book"

John Bolton: Former U.S. permanent representative to the United Nations "Stealth Jihad puts a provocative hypothesis to the test of empirical reality with forcefulness and clarity. Many will disagree with—including our likely next president and vice president—but the burden is now on them to disprove this book."
R. James Woolsey is the former director of Central Intelligence. Here is what he says about Stealth Jihad:
"Robert Spencer makes a solid case that the major threat to our way of life does not come solely from those radical Islamists who embrace violence and terrorism. It also comes from those who do not accept that they must live side-by-side on a basis of equality with those of other faiths in a civil society and who instead work in multiple ways toward obtaining special standing for Islam in our society and, ultimately, toward theocracy. A vital wake-up call of a book."
But Woolsey is just one of several Islamic, intelligence, and counterintelligence experts who are rallying behind Spencer's book....

Steve Emerson: "The Definitive Book on Islam"
Steve Emerson is a terrorism expert and analyst. Author of American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Among Us, he proclaims:
"Robert Spencer has written the definitive book on radical jihadists. It's a brilliant and remarkable analysis and exposé of how Western society has succumbed corruptively to intimidation and appeasement and the demands of radical Islam. This book is a MUST READ for anyone wanting to know the truth abut radical Islam's threat to the West and to moderate Muslims."
And he's not alone....

Andrew C. McCarthy: "Stealth Jihad Unfolds the Comprehensive Threat"

Andrew C. McCarthy is the legal affairs editor for National Review and bestselling author of Willful Blindness: A Memoir of Jihad, and he has nothing but praise for Stealth Jihad:
"Legions of jihadists are determined to advance the cause of a universally dominant Islam—not just by violence, but by encroaching Islamic law and custom through litigation, political correctness, and exploitation of the West's crisis of confidence. In exposing this agenda, no writer has been more fearless, relentless, and effective than Robert Spencer. In Stealth Jihad he unfolds the comprehensive threat as well as it's ever been done."
Experts agree: Stealth Jihad is not just another book on terrorism. It is the definitive book on the new front in terrorism and a must read for every American.
As an Islamic expert, Spencer has led seminars on Islam and jihad for the United States Central Command, United States Army Command, the Joint Terrorism Task Force, and the U.S. intelligence community.
He is also the author of eight books on Islam and jihad, including the New York Times bestseller, The Truth About Muhammad.
In addition to his seminars and writing, Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a weekly columnist for Human Events and Front Page Magazine website.

How To Protect Your Freedom

Stealth Jihad shows that too many Americans is all but oblivious to a new kind of threat presented by a loosely organized movement whose activists are well funded, highly motivated, and relentless in pursuit of their agenda.
You can join Spencer in the fight against terrorism, for just $27.95—which is a small price to pay for your freedom. Plus, you can save more than 20% off bookstore prices by clicking on one of the online retailer sites below.
To order Stealth Jihad from Amazon.com, please CLICK HERE now.
To order Stealth Jihad from BarnesandNoble.com, please CLICK HERE now.
Then get ready to join—and win—the fight against the stealth jihad.
Sincerely,

 

Marji Ross
President and Publisher
Regnery Publishing

Question: What is America 's first line of missile
interceptor defense that protects the entire United States ?
Answer: 49th Missile Defense Battalion of Alaska National Guard.


Question: What is the ONLY National Guard unit on
permanent active duty?
Answer: 49th Missile Defense Battalion of Alaska National Guard


Question: Who is the Commander in Chief of the 49th Missile
Defense Battalion of Alaska National Guard?
Answer: Governor Sarah Palin, Alaska

Question: What U.S. governor is routinely briefed on
highly classified military issues, homeland security, and
counter terrorism?
Answer: Governor Sarah Palin, Alaska

Question: What U.S. governor has a higher classified
security rating than either candidate of the Democrat Party?
Answer: Governor Sarah Palin, Alaska

According to the Washington Post, she first met with McCain
in February, but nobody ever found out. This is a woman used
to keeping secrets. She can be entrusted with our national
security, because she already is.

Now you know too, please, pass it on!

  Tough Love vs. Spanking - Good Argument

Most of the American population thinks it improper to spank children, so I have tried other methods to control my kids when they have one of 'those moments.'

One that I found effective is for me to just take the child for a car ride and talk.

Some say it's the vibration from the car, others say it's the time away from any distractions such as TV, Video Games, Computer, IPod, etc.

Either way, my kids usually calm down and stop misbehaving after our car ride together. Ey e to eye contact helps a lot too.

I've included a photo below of one of my sessions with my son, in case you would like to use the technique.

Sincerely,
Your Friend

This works with grandchildren,
nieces, and nephews as well.

 England today... ...America next!!  They are on the way!     

      Atlanta is reported to have 80,000 Muslims and they are building a 46,000 sq. ft. mosque in the city....the largest in America!

      The population of Muslims is growing by leaps and bounds in every major American city.  Get ready for demonstrations to begin.

      Pictures from London ~ this is beyond scary...

Makes you wonder doesn't it...can you imagine having a Christian demonstration against Islam in downtown Baghdad !

 View the pictures below and decide how you really feel about the future of the Western World.

These pictures are of Muslims marching through the STREETS OF LONDON during their recent 'Religion of Peace Demonstration.' 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why would anyone think that we should be at war with such nice, peaceful Muslims?

All Christians need to know. You need to forward this one to everyone! These pictures tell it all!

Muslims have stated that England will be the first country they take over!

These are pictures not shown on American TV or in American Newspapers (as they might help Bush's war on terror), but were forwarded by a Canadian who thought All Christians ought to know!

    

 

 

 

 

Renee Halay

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government."  (George Washington)

 

 

This could be a disaster.....

  > *WARNING FROM PAKISTAN

 

 

 

 

 

> *WARNING FROM PAKISTAN

>  

> This morning, from a cave somewhere in Pakistan , Taliban Minister

> of Migration Mohammed Omar, warned the United States that if

> military actions against Iraq continues, Taliban authorities intend

> to cut off America 's supply of Convenience Store Managers and

> possibly Motel 6 Managers. If this action does not yield sufficient

> results, Cab Drivers will be next, followed by DELL and AOL

> customer service reps. Finally, if all else fails, they have

> threatened to send us NO more candidates for President of the

> United States !

>  

 

 

 

> It's gonna get ugly!!!*

 

  

Can you believe John McCain cannot use a computer?

 

After all, computers today in government and the business world are primarily used for email, Word, Excel and other very simple, simple programs.  They have been dummy proofed so that anyone can use them and it requires little to no complex thought and a few minutes to hours to learn.  Hmm… you would assume that the Obama team wants to imply that John McCain is simple minded and unable to process complex thoughts.  

 

On the flip side, the cockpit of a fighter jet seems to be many complex computers working in unison. 

 

To fly a fighter jet lends itself to years of education, training and experience in:

 

·         Aerodynamics

·         Aviation policy

·         International law

·         Top level understanding of Government processes

·         Survival techniques

·         Physical agility and Confidence

·         Extreme Hand-eye coordination

·         IQ and Quick Decision response

·         Highest levels of internal discipline

·         Unprecedented Communications Skills

·         Math & Sciences education

·         The highest levels of compassion and morals

·         Respect for the rule of law

·         Leadership

·         Strategy and Tactics capabilities

·         Rational and Complex thought capabilities

·         Etc, etc, etc..

 

Ok, this description of a typical fighter pilot sounds like someone that we would want to lead our country.  You add a strong family background and a lifetime commitment to public service, leadership and protecting our country.  Include a toughness that is unprecedented with years as a POW, leader and fighter for what is right in our country.   Someone who is a patriot, believes in constitution of the United States and so much more that it’s hard to do a comparison.  So now that we know who John McCain is and what he is made of, it’s hard to even consider a comparison to Barack Obama.  Yes, he can use a computer and he is one of the best orators of our time, but I would challenge you to put his name next to many of the qualities of John McCain above and walk away with any other conclusion. 

 

It’s either John McCain, the heart and soul of this country with leadership, pride and patriotism unprecedented in our history or Barack Obama, a lawyer with a shady Chicago neighborhood political history that has been elevated by a group of thugs in Congress, New York, and Chicago to include some in the Press and Academia and bought by International supporters who would like to see America’s economic system fail but can apparently “Use a Computer”. 

 

So do you want a computer user for a president or a fighter pilot?  

Barack Obama has put out an ad that simply reminded us John McCain cannot use a computer. Well guess what ... Barack cannot land a jet plane on an aircraft carrier at night.

 

 

 

---

BUY Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

                   DO YOU REMEMBER THIS GUY ? 

'Here's my strategy on the Cold War: We win, they lose.' - Ronald Reagan 



'The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.' - Ronald Reagan 


'The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.' - < /FONT>Ronald Reagan 


'Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because theU.S. was too strong.' 
- Ronald Reagan


'I have wondered at times about what the Ten Commandments would have looked like if Moses had run them through the U.S. Congress.' - Ronald Reagan 


'The taxpayer: That's someone who works for the federal government but doesn't have to take the civil service examination.' 
- Ronald Reagan 


'Government is like a baby: An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other.' 
- Ronald Reagan 


'It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first.' -Ronald Reagan 


'Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.' - Ronald Reagan 





'No arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is as formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.' - < /B>Ronald Reagan 



'If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.' 
- Ronald Reagan