MyFox
 

Dak413's Blog

by Dak413 from Krum, Tx

Last Post 10 days, 4 hours Ago


Here is the galons per barrel of each derivitive in a 42 gallon barrel of crude,

My question is how is this  country going to power other main sources of transpertation

without oil ,  when basically all power eguipment is fueled by diesel, 

constrution equipment, trucks , train engines ,,

and jet fuel for planes,

there  are so many unanswered questions about how we are

going to power all these things without petroleum products , I've never heard any

discussion of what the plan is for all these different things, I get the feeling these things

are not being addressed , I think this country needs to drill here, and drill now, becuz we

are going to need curde oil for at least another 50 years or more.

Any ideas out there ? 

This is probably the biggesst security issue there is for this country .

 

 

 

Figure 1. Products Made from a Barrel of Crude Oil (Gallons)

16 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 16
Page 1 of 1
bilmorgbc read my blog
Aug 10, 2008 | 11:52 AM

You could eliminate about half the diesel from oil with biodiesel. (25% in winter and all in summer) Since biodiesel can be made from so many different sources,it may be a possibility. But we still need to drill.

jla5906 read my blog view my photos
Aug 10, 2008 | 12:25 PM

energy is security.That is why we need energy independance.Also I do not think we can do without oil as an energy source, but all combined sources of nuclear, coal, wind, squirrel cages what ever.

scottythecomic read my blog view my photos
Aug 10, 2008 | 3:39 PM

I was listening to the former CEO of Shell Oil talk about this with Glenn Beck.

Dak413 read my blog view my photos
Aug 10, 2008 | 3:46 PM

more interesting facts here,

http://www.eia.doe.gov/bookshelf/brochures/diesel/diese
l2006/dieselprices2006.html

also the government and states make more money off oil, than the oil companies do by 3 time !!

USNA4 read my blog
Aug 10, 2008 | 6:13 PM

Thats not really correct Dak. The oil companies make plenty of profit from the oil/refining/retail markets, and it is absolutely their right to do so. The issue is, do we keep sending out $billions to foreign companies, or spend our $billions here with domestic companies that will provide high paying jobs, tax payments and long term domestic growth?
Bio derived Diesel, even B100 from non food source commodities will barely make a dent in the demand, but are an excellent start.
REFINING capacity is going to be the key to our future... I repeat, REFINING is the key!

scottythecomic read my blog view my photos
Aug 10, 2008 | 6:32 PM

Bio is also too costly.

Dak413 read my blog view my photos
Aug 10, 2008 | 7:22 PM

true, we n eedrfnery apacity, and our own supply of oil, but ya can't blame oil companies, we buy their products, are they suppose to lose money like the airlines, I don't think so,if ya think about it, if our government doesn't care about what our supply is ccosting, why should the oil companies,they can stil makea 10% profit, which is less thn a lot of other big business, and think about this, the state and fereral government is making 3 times what they are from oil they pay tax on their profits, plus the governments get all the gas tax , and they want them to finance all the other energy options, sounds a little onesided, to Me !!

Dak413 read my blog view my photos
Aug 10, 2008 | 7:40 PM

what i would really lik to see, is that 700 billion dollars being sent to foreign govyss dpent in this country!!!,that is what is criminal in all this

scottythecomic read my blog view my photos
Aug 10, 2008 | 9:25 PM

In effect, we're propping up their governments and militaries with OUR money!

TexanInfidel read my blog view my photos
Aug 11, 2008 | 7:54 AM

Biodiesel is also flawed and has blown up engines - why do you think they backed off of it?

And refining is definitely the key.

bilmorgbc read my blog
Aug 11, 2008 | 8:13 AM

Low sulphur diesel has also blown up some older engines. Do we quit using that too? Biodiesel made from soy beans is too expensive and that is the fuel giving trouble. However I know truckers using the cotton seed based bio that are having good luck with it. They get about the same mileage and performance as diesel. And most of that bio is made from seed that would have been burned as scrap. It seems like the powers that be always push the wrong thing to do,like ethanol.Jatropha is a plant that will grow in arid regions that are not being farmed at present and it's beans can make oil which can be used for any fuel.

TexanInfidel read my blog view my photos
Aug 11, 2008 | 8:21 AM

I'm just telling you why they backed off the biodiesel. The price of diesel is through the roof (we saw it for $4.19 this weekend and did a little happy dance) because taxes are much higher on it. I have nothing against alternative fuels but the government needs to let the free market dictate.

Dak413 read my blog view my photos
Aug 11, 2008 | 8:36 AM

the government looks at each new soure of energy as a new source of tax revenue , part of the reason it's expansion is so slow !! instead of waiting for a solid demand for a product is achieved !

Dak413 read my blog view my photos
Aug 11, 2008 | 8:53 AM

the only way new soures are ever really gonna catch on is they are enough cheaper people will switch to them, and that is about the only reason !! so far everything they have come up with costs more, not less !!

TexasTruBlu read my blog view my photos
Aug 11, 2008 | 4:53 PM

The biodiesel facility in Denton tanked and packed up overnight. That was after the city of Denton converted all their vehicles to biodiesel. I think it makes great sense for cooking oils and other products that can be reformulated into fuel, but I also think unless some bigger entity is willing to take on the responsibility for organizing it, there will continue to be con artists that run it as a fly by night operation.

Dak413 read my blog view my photos
Aug 12, 2008 | 7:41 AM

personally I don't think they can ever produce enough biodiesel to make a dent in what is needed for the power class of engines, and have seen no evidence of anything to replace diesel for this class, and reducing production, only further cuts into this area, and makes diesel even more expensive, and further raises the cost of everything we consume, this price raise right now has hilited the effect it has on ommerial transportation and what it has done to the onsumer, in comparison that ost hurts more than the gas for our own cars, we need apln for the ommerial transportation of products and people that I don't see being addressed . We will never be able to run this transportation from windpower, solar or nucleur, and I don't see coal as possiblilty either ,

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Dak413

I am 66 years old and moved to Texas about a year and half ago to be closer to My sons.

Member Since: 2/6/2008