1. The constitutional amendment
providing for the continuation of the constitutional appropriation for
facilities and other capital items at Angelo State
University on a change in
the governance of the university.
No position aside from government meddling in education, but that isn't part of this amendment.
2. The constitutional amendment
providing for the issuance of $500 million in general obligation bonds to
finance educational loans to students and authorizing bond enhancement
agreements with respect to general obligation bonds issued for that purpose.
AGAINST: Bonds
cause future tax increases. Government subsidies to students enable
university bureacrats to keep raising tuitions and fees. Student debt
upon graduation has skyrocketed in the past ten years, and we shouldn't
encourage that trend with more tax dollars.
3. The constitutional amendment
authorizing the legislature to provide that the maximum appraised value of a
residence homestead for ad valorem taxation is limited to the lesser of the
most recent market value of the residence homestead as determined by the
appraisal entity or 110 percent, or a greater percentage, of the appraised
value of the residence homestead for the preceding tax year.
No position, aside from it being a government theft program, but that isn't part of this amendment.
4. The constitutional amendment
authorizing the issuance of up to $1 billion in bonds payable from the general
revenues of the state for maintenance, improvement, repair, and construction
projects and for the purchase of needed equipment.
AGAINST: Freedom requires less spending on state facilities, not more.
5. The constitutional amendment
authorizing the legislature to permit the voters of a municipality having a
population of less than 10,000 to authorize the governing body of the
municipality to enter into an agreement with an owner of real property in or
adjacent to an area in the municipality that has been approved for funding
under certain programs administered by the Texas Department of Agriculture
under which the parties agree that all ad valorem taxes imposed on the owner’s
property may not be increased for the first five tax years after the tax year
in which the agreement is entered into.
AGAINST: This
would shift the tax burden onto non-downtown property owners. Freedom opposes giving privileged status to politically popular
sectors, although it strongly support reducing taxes across the board.
6. The constitutional amendment
authorizing the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation one motor
vehicle owned by an individual and used in the course of the owner’s occupation
or profession and also for personal activities of the owner.
No position, less taxation is always good, but this is applied in a discriminatory fashion.
7. The constitutional amendment to
allow governmental entities to sell property acquired through eminent domain
back to the previous owners at the price the entities paid to acquire the
property.
FOR: This
would provide a small amount of protection in some cases. However, the
2007 legislature failed to pass stronger protections against eminent
domain, and this is a perfect case where politicians are likely to
mislead voters by claiming they support eminent domain reform more than
they really do.
8. The constitutional amendment to
clarify certain provisions relating to the making of a home equity loan and use
of home equity loan proceeds.
No position aside from government meddling in private affairs, but that isn't part of this amendment.
9. The constitutional amendment
authorizing the legislature to exempt all or part of the residence homesteads
of certain totally disabled veterans from ad valorem taxation and authorizing a
change in the manner of determining the amount of the existing exemption from
ad valorem taxation to which a disabled veteran is entitled.
No position, less taxation is always good, but this is applied in a discriminatory fashion.
10. The constitutional amendment to
abolish the constitutional authority for the office of inspector of hides and
animals.
FOR: Freedom supports eliminating government waste. We wish this amendment would also eliminate the State Board of
Education and many other branches, which would represent a real cut in government.
11. The constitutional amendment to
require that a record vote be taken by a house of the legislature on final
passage of any bill, other than certain local bills, of a resolution proposing
or ratifying a constitutional amendment, or of any other nonceremonial
resolution, and to provide for public access on the Internet to those record
votes.
FOR: This
would allow voters to actually find out how their representatives voted
on final passage of a bill. More accountability is good.
12. The constitutional amendment
providing for the issuance of general obligation bonds by the Texas
Transportation Commission in an amount not to exceed $5 billion to provide
funding for highway improvement projects.
AGAINST: The
government already does a terrible job of spending transportation tax
dollars, and we should not provide new revenue sources.
13. The constitutional amendment
authorizing the denial of bail to a person who violates certain court orders or
conditions of release in a felony or family violence case.
No position
14. The constitutional amendment permitting
a justice or judge who reaches the mandatory retirement age while in office to
serve the remainder of the justice’s or judge’s current term.
FOR: Let elderly judges work if they want to. Freedom requires that there be no forced retirement by government rendering the whole "mandatory retirement age" unconstitutional.
15. The constitutional amendment
requiring the creation of the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas
and authorizing the issuance of up to $3 billion in bonds payable from the
general revenues of the state for research in Texas to find the causes of and
cures for cancer.
AGAINST: Medical
research is not a legitimate function of government. Funding for
medical research should stay in the private sector. There is plenty of
profit motive in seeking patents for drugs and medical devices, and if
that weren't enough, there is also a great deal of funding provided by
voluntary charitable donations.
16. The constitutional amendment
providing for the issuance of additional general obligation bonds by the Texas
Water Development Board in an amount not to exceed $250 million to provide
assistance to economically distressed areas.
AGAINST: Developers
build neighborhoods without providing and paying for infrastructure
like water, then want other taxpayers to pay for water and wastewater
services for their developments. Wrong. Development should pay for
itself without outside tax subsidies.
Early voting starts October 22 and ends November 2. Election day is Tuesday, November 6.
Adapted from a Libertarian Email.
| Member Comments |
I am intelligent enough to know that politics are not 1 dimensional. I am neither right nor left, Republicrat nor Demlican (as if there's a difference), conservative nor modern "liberal". Most blogs posted under this persona are not my originals.
Member Since: 10/12/2006