MyFox
 

Day2's Blog

by Day2 from Rowlett, Texas

Last Post 292 days, 14 hours Ago


If you had to choose between being an alcoholic or drug addict which would you choose? I’m almost inclined to go with drug addict. Why? Because I can’t imagine what it must be like to live in this society as an alcoholic. You don’t walk into a restaurant, pull out a menu and find “heroin” and “crack cocaine” listed as a favorite beverage to accompany your meal. How about “A meth Happy Hour!”

Seems if you’re trying to kick the habit as an alcoholic, there are many more triggers, billboards, tv commercials, and happy hours that glorify drinking. I’m not against drinking. I’m a TEXAS GIRL…I like my beer and yes in a bottle - don’t dare pour into one of those fancy smancy glasses!! But ABUSE seems to take on a whole new life of its own interfering with work, family, and at worst one’s physical health.

So my question is what are the options for alcoholics? Does AA work? How does a group of individuals all with the dire desire to abuse alcohol get together, sit around, talk about alcohol and help each other quite?

I’m not bashing AA. I would imagine (hopefully) lots of individuals have successfuly found sobriety by attending. I have lots of reasons for asking these questions some are personal and some to broaden my perspective on the issue.

 

28 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 28
Page 1 of 2
1
Last
junecleaver read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 7:03 AM

I'm so glad you joined the blogs, Day, you have such great thoughts & ideas. I think AA's concept is to take it one day at a time. Thus, when met with a challenge such as "Would you like wine with dinner?" the alcoholic can feel empowered to make the choice whether to imbibe or not. AA helps the alcoholic understand his/her weakness (alcohol) & how to gain power over it. I know some AA members who have to actually say, "No, thank you, I'm an alcoholic", if someone asks why they turned down a drink. I actually admire these people far more than those who refuse to admit they have a problem, even though they go through a case of beer a night. It's like me with food. I have to consciously push the roll basket or cookie tray away from me. My 17 year old daughter helps me by removing the roll basket & putting it way out of my reach.

ProudAmerican read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 7:20 AM

Alcoholism is a disease not a choice. Drugs are a choice.

terrellmom read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 7:39 AM

If someone wants to quit drugs or alcohol they can and i'm sure AA offers many a chance of recovery that they might not have had otherwise. Support is the key to AA. just like Weight Watchers is for food addicts

PokerPhil777 read my blog
Feb 13, 2008 | 8:26 AM

If you're going to put alcoholism as a disease, then drugs are too. Both are addictions. You make a CHOICE to take your first drink even though others in your family are alcoholics. But even if no one else in your family is an alcoholic, no one holds a gun to your head to start drinking. It's just as much of a choice as drugs are. It all about your addictive personality and how strong you are at controlling it. And when it comes to quitting YOU have to decide to quit. No program can help you until you decide to help yourself.
Day2, you do bring up a good point. Drug addicts aren't tempted at every eating establishment, (like an alcoholic might be) though they might be tempted by every pharmaceutical company while watching TV at almost every commercial break. lol.

PokerPhil777 read my blog
Feb 13, 2008 | 8:29 AM

TM, you are correct, food is another addiction. Talk about tempted with that disease! Everyone is different, but everyone has their own addiction they have to learn to control before it controls them, cell phones, computers, BLOGS, video games, coffee, soft drinks, alcohol, drugs (legal and illegal), food, gambling, fishing, whatever, truly ANYTHING can be an addiction if you let it be.

chardoney read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 8:41 AM

I don't think either are a disease. Addictions - still a lot not known. Is is personality, choice, gene's?

Maybe it's a little like lying, which some seem to be an 'addicted' to, but something they can stop, if they chose to. In the end, it all goes to personal responsibility and no one's 'fault' but their own.

I have no idea how AA works, but whatever works, as long as it's legal and moral, is it not a good thing? Hope you find the answer you're interested in.

Bellafisk read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 9:08 AM

I believe it starts with the genes. Just as cancer, depression and other health issues are tied to the genes so is the "addictive" gene. I have seen this with the depression gene in someone close to me. Of 8 children in that family all of them are on antidepressants. The same family also has the "addictive" gene as well. With new discoveries that are being made now if you are aware that that particular gene is in your family you can take steps to avoid becoming addicted to anything. However if you are in your early teens with pressure from your peers to try certain things you may not be mature enough to say no.

As far as AA I had a boss that was forced to go due to killing three people in a drunk driving accident. I feel that just sharing stories of how drinking has destroyed different lives and ruined relationships is a reminder of what could happen if you start drinking again. Also I think it probably is comforting because the people there KNOW from experience what you are going through. It is different if they talk to someone who does not have the same problem. You know the saying "you don't know what it feels like unless you are going through the same thing". They are able to relate to each other through a common thread.

ProudAmerican read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 9:17 AM

http://www.campral.com/und_alc.aspx?WT.srch=1&Placement
GUID=F2DF4B78-1420-4724-9052-73778D7AA2D6

http://www.campral.com/rec_symptoms.aspx

Alcoholism is a disease and yes Bella it is passed down through the genes. Unlike those who choose to use drugs.

Bellafisk read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 9:29 AM

I somewhat disagree. Alcoholism is a disease but just as you would choose to do drugs you also choose to drink. It is the "addictive" gene that is what is so important. It means you have a greater chance of becoming addicted to ANYTHING whether it be alcohol or drugs. The main difference is that alcohol is legal and much more easily obtained than drugs are. I'm sure that is why there are more alcoholics than drugies. Easier and cheaper to drink than do drugs.

cjl1618 read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 10:43 AM

I know people that have told me that the new TV series "Breaking Bad" is one they can't watch. Seeing scenes of people smoking meth is to much of a trigger.

One must decide that they have had enough of alcohol or drugs before they can stop. If they are truly an alcoholic drinker or serious drug abuser, by the time they make that decision, their life, and the lives of those that love them, are generally hell.

We care for our loved ones that have the problem, but don't usually know how to help. We enable them instead. We make excuses for their behavior in an effort to deny the reality of just how out of control all of their lives have become.

When a person really reaches that place that they cannot face themselves in the mirror anymore, then a 12 step group can be a life saving place to be.

It is not that people sit around talking about alcohol.

It is being around other people who know exactly what you are going through. Others whose lives have been in the gutter; whose families have left them; who have lost job after job; who have been in jail; who have wrecked cars; and who have battled to get their lives back on track.

Go to a twelve step meeting and you will find people who have been clean for a day, and people who have been clean for 20 years. It is all about support and help.

Just my opinion any way for what it is worth.

Bellafisk read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 10:54 AM

You hit the nail on the head cjl. It is easy to judge someone or criticize someone about something you have no personal knowledge of.

Day2 read my blog
Feb 13, 2008 | 11:24 AM

Addiction is rooted deep in our biological makeup. I don't think addiction in and of itself is a choice BUT the form of the addiction played out in our lives becomes chosen: Some choose food, gambling, drugs, prescriptions, alcohol and even, yes, sex.

Seems society offers resources and help for the "socially accepted" addictions while calling every other form a crime and simple lack of will power.

If you are addicted to food, you can find a medicine to help curb your appetitie (your addiction)...you can have surgery to shrink your stomach, you can join a weight watchers group. All these seem acceptable. Addicted to drugs? Be prepared to hide from the law, and your doctor surely isn't going to prescribe you a medication to help curb anything.

As a food addict, show up at your favorite food establishment, walk up, place your order, and then an undercover officer puts you in cuffs. I know this sounds like I'm exaggerating, but I used this to get my point across. I just don't get it. I just don't get it. I don't have the answers. Will we as a society ever agree that we need to offer help (medical, spiritual, and the likes) to help the "non-socially" accepted addictions? In my mind, I not only hope for it, I PRAY for it.

cjl1618 read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 11:32 AM

Oh and I think either drugs or alcohol are tough to stop. With drugs you can see your life change in MONTHS rather than years.

Start smoking meth, or shooting heroin and do it for 3 months. You would have such an overwhelming need for the drug you would likely do anything to get it.

You have to remember too that drugs and alcohol make us feel good. We don't drink or do dope just because. We do it because the feeling can be incredible.

Way back in the day when ecstasy was legal, you could go to a club and everyone was doing it, buying it at the bar like a drink. It felt good. Smoking pot feels good (and hungry and sleepy) - you know what I mean.

The govt and people that rail against these things, just can't understand that people do drugs the first time for lots of reasons; they do it again because the first time felt great.

Ask many addicts and they will tell you that they have been chasing the feeling of that first high for years and never get to it.

An easy trap to get into and a spiral that often ends in serious addiction and all the things that go with it.

I myself would prefer to see pot legal and alcohol illegal to tell the truth. People that smoke pot don't go home and beat on the kids and the wife. Lots and lots of drinkers do.

Again just one guys opinion for what it may be worth.

Bellafisk read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 11:44 AM

The problem is that people with NO addictions are quick to judge. They think "oh they could do something about it". ALL forms of addiction should have help no matter what the addiction. Its like in previous comments that drugs is a choice whereas alcohol is more accepted. People think badly about drug addicts thinking "well they put themselves in that situation".

It is clear that rules need to change with the changing times. A lot of the drug addicts did not have parents that gave a hoot while others are from loving families. Hence the "addiction" gene. And alcohol is so widely abused because alot of the parents drink moderately and they think if their child has a drink it is not anything major. I'd rather my child have a drink at home than somewhere else is widely used. Again you have to lead by example.

People judge against the non-socially accepted addictions because they blame the addict and think they should know better. The schools are regulating menus now because of the number of obsese kids. The fast food places as well as other supermarket foods are getting rid of transfat. There are no plans in place for the "non-socially" accepted addictions. The public has to change their opionions first.

I think alot more people would get help.

Day2 read my blog
Feb 13, 2008 | 12:16 PM

Perhaps I should come clean as to why this topic is so important to me. A few months back, my brother and I were at a local bar doing some good-ole country dancing and enjoying a few beers. We got to the parking lot on our way out where a VERY INTOXICATED MAN was being thrown out by security. After a verbal confrontation in the parking lot, the man proceeded to walk off but not before decking ME and my brother and trying to take a swing at everyone else within reaching distance. Obviously the police were called, charges filed and the man is now facing trial and punishment. I was asked by the DA what I proposed his punishment be....apparently, victims of this nature now get to make a recommendation. I said I did not think jail time or monetary fines were going to do the trick. Yes this man is a danger to himself and others around him when he's intoxicated.

BUT this got me thinking...what are HIS OPTIONS?? What in the world am I supposed to give him for PUNISHMENT for being an alcoholic? I offered AA only. This doesn't make me a better person for not wanting to throw him in jail, but I didn't know what else could help this guy. THERE JUST AREN'T ANY OTHER OPTIONS: jail, fines, and AA. That's about it. Too bad...I wish I could have offered this guy a better option & hope but i simply didn't have it to give.

Bellafisk read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 12:29 PM

I think you did the right thing. If he is forced to go to AA then maybe it will force him to see how much he needs help and maybe he will stay on the program. Each individual is different. You did him a big favor though cause jail time or monetary fines would not have helped him at all. Who knows maybe this is a step in the right direction and could be a life saving thing for him. One could only hope.

scottythecomic read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 12:51 PM

I don't buy into the addiction/disease model. What I do see is what is called a besetting sin, that is, an ongoing choice. True, some can bring with them a physical dependence, but that makes it no more a disease. Getting to biblical jargon, one that labels this a disease would have to presuppose that God would send someone to hell for a disease. He wouldn't anymore then He'd send a cancer patient.

scottythecomic read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 12:54 PM

The success rate through AA is actually lower than the rate for those who quit on their own. Fewer than 10% of drunks quit through AA in their lifetime.

AA is man's wisdom melded with eastern mysticism, loose Christian principles and other religious notions.

If you ever want a good read on how AA came to be formed, you'd have to read Bob's personal story - not the one in the Big Book of AA, but rather his book. He actually delved in divination to get the steps, and these are his own words, not mine.

Day2 read my blog
Feb 13, 2008 | 12:55 PM

You think God would send someone to Hell for being a drug addict or alchoholic? I'm confused, scottythecomic. Please elaborate. I am interested in hearing more.

scottythecomic read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2008 | 1:28 PM

No, what I am saying is that God wouldn't allow someone to go to hell for being "diseased", as in drinking or drugs and addiction. Therefore, what is commonly called drug and alcohol addiction, and a disease model, flies in the face of what God calls it in the Bible: drunkenness and sin. The disease model is new - circa this century.

Page 1 of 2
1
Last


Write your comment below:




Day2

I am an inspired individual who enjoys sharing ideas to promote a safer and better community in the best interest of all citizens. I am a mother of 3 children, I work full-time (love what I do) and believe that you have to take a stance and express your viewpoint sometimes even when it's not popular. This is a gr8 venue for expressing these viewpoints. I enjoying sharing thoughts with you all on FOX4! Thank you FOX4 for making this possible!

Member Since: 2/9/2008