MyFox
 

Judgenot's Blog

by Judgenot from Texas

Last Post 6 hours Ago


I don’t know about the rest of you but I’m very unhappy with this so called the  sky falling.We have through history endured bad times.Why is this different? Can anyone tell me?

 Princeton economist Paul Krugmanamong others   accused the US Treasury and the Fed of playing "Russian roulette" with the financial system, warning that the shadow banking network could disintegrate within days.

And I honestly feel this whole scare tactic has created irreversible harm to our country. This  link will show  our unemployment rate since 1948.

I'm convinced that agreements among central banks to create U.S. debt these past 15 years have existed, although secretly and out of the reach of any oversight of anyone--especially the U.S. Congress that doesn't care, or just flat doesn't understand.

  http://www.miseryindex.us/urbymonth.asp


 

 

Add a Comment

Just in case you didn't know the Federal Reserve is a private company of Bankers with twelve branch banks that confiscate our money and have been for nearly a hundred years.

 They are not a part of the United States Government yet today they collect hundred of billions of dollars from American taxpayers every year.

 

 In 1913 while members of Congress were home for Christmas the Federal Reserve Act was rammed through Congress and later signed by President Wilson. At a later date Wilson admitted with remorse, when referring to the Fed." I have unwittingly ruined my country.  

 Now comes the Income Tax!!!!  

 

  The Income Tax was only needed to pay interest to the bankers for our money that they loaned to our government. Our taxes are paying the interest on loans our government has.    As of March 6, 2006. the national dept stands at 8.2 trillion dollars. The American taxpayer have paid the FED banking system $173,875,979,369.66 in interest on that dept in just five short months, from October,2005,through February,2006.  

 

   On June 4,1963,President Kennedy signed a Presidential decree,Executive Order 11110. This order virtually stripped the Federal Reserve Bank of it's power  to loan money to the United States Government at interest. In less than five months after signing that executive order President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22,1963.  

 This executive order stands today: And what we have given to this so-called agency is the authority to counterfeit money." The privately held Federal Reserve Bank has not once been audited and never pays any income tax on their astonishing income. The bank is supposed to bring stability to the economy, however, almost every war crash can be attributed to the Federal Reserve Bank including the Great Depression, WW I, WW II, the Gulf War etc. The Fed allows Congress to spend all they want that's why your Congressperson does nothing. Ron Paul introduces bill to eliminate Federal Reserve Bank: see GovTrack.us. H.R. 2755--110th Congress (2007): To abolish the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve.

 

 

  NOTE 90% source data used  comes from official government sources
this is not 'conspiracy theory' it's simply factual evidence of collusion. We as taxpayers deserve a government by the people for the people, and not a tyrannical criminal enterprise.

 

 

9 Comments | Add a Comment

Just in case you didn't know the Federal Reserve is a private company of Bankers with twelve branch banks that confiscate our money and have been for nearly a hundred years. They are not a part of the United States Government yet today they collect hundred of billions of dollars from American taxpayers every year.

 In 1913 while members of Congress were home for Christmas the Federal Reserve Act was rammed through Congress and later signed by President Wilson. At a later date Wilson admitted with remorse, when referring to the Fed." I have unwittingly ruined my country.  

 Now comes the Income Tax!!!!  

The Income Tax was only needed to pay interest to the bankers for our money that they loaned to our government. Our taxes are paying the interest on loans our government has.    As of March 6, 2006. the national dept stands at 8.2 trillion dollars. The American taxpayer have paid the FED banking system $173,875,979,369.66 in interest on that dept in just five short months, from October,2005,through February,2006.   On June 4,1963,President Kennedy signed a Presidential decree,Executive Order 11110. This order virtually stripped the Federal Reserve Bank of it's power  to loan money to the United States Government at interest. In less than five months after signing that executive order President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22,1963.   This executive order stands today:

 

 And what we have given to this so-called agency is the authority to counterfeit money." The privately held Federal Reserve Bank has not once been audited and never pays any income tax on their astonishing income. The bank is supposed to bring stability to the economy, however, almost every war crash can be attributed to the Federal Reserve Bank including the Great Depression, WW I, WW II, the Gulf War etc. The Fed allows Congress to spend all they want that's why your Congressperson does nothing. Ron Paul introduces bill to eliminate Federal Reserve Bank: see GovTrack.us. H.R. 2755--110th Congress (2007): To abolish the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve.

 

NOTE 90% source data used  comes from official government sources
this is not 'conspiracy theory' it's simply factual evidence of collusion. We as taxpayers deserve a government by the people for the people, and not a tyrannical criminal enterprise.


 

 

 

 

 

Add a Comment

By now, it should be perfectly clear that Americans live with a one-party system that represents money and war, period!This bailout proved to me that Democracy is gone.I feel  Obama will deliver the same package: Militarism, global  Poverty,  and - quite possibly - civil war. The system is broken along with the banks. Democracy is dead. Corruption is systemic. "The People" have no options left. It is as simple as that.

 

 The Liberals have worked and will work hard to rationalize the Obama reversals, contradictions and double standards because the people have no political candidates and options remaining to stop the so called war for democracy they are conducting in the Middle East, not to mention the worldwide dislocations produced from their lawless rogues on Wall Street.  Wake up; be aware this bailout should tell you something.

 

 

 

2 Comments | Add a Comment

By now, it should be perfectly clear that Americans live with a one-party system that represents money and war, period!This bailout proved to me that Democracy is gone.I feel  Obama will deliver the same package: Militarism, global  Poverty,  and - quite possibly - civil war. The system is broken along with the banks. Democracy is dead. Corruption is systemic. "The People" have no options left. It is as simple as that.

 

 The Liberals have worked and will work hard to rationalize the Obama reversals, contradictions and double standards because the people have no political candidates and options remaining to stop the bloodbath they are conducting in the Middle East, not to mention the worldwide dislocations produced from their lawless rogues on Wall Street.  Wake up; be aware this bailout should tell you something.

 

6 Comments | Add a Comment

Congrats to the Obama supporters he has a lot on his plate and I’m sure he will bring us the change he promised.

He is a well spoken man, a very educated man and I wish the best and I will pray for him and his family.

1 Comment | Add a Comment

I was surprised at my match. See who you identify with.

http://wjbk.4wmt.com/cmm/

Was it who you thought?

4 Comments | Add a Comment

Police departments in cities across the country are preparing for Election Day, for possible  civil unrest and riots after the presidential contest.  Some worry that if Barack Obama loses and there is  suspicion of  foul play in the election, violence could ensue in cities with large black populations.  You got an African-American running and a  woman running prompting speculation that there could be a violent backlash if he loses unexpectedly.

What are local election officials doing to prepare for what people think will be record turnout at the polls.They are preparing for what they think could be public  unrest among voters. 

Carville, who served as a senior political adviser to former President Bill Clinton, said that many Democrats would be very angry if Obama loses. He noted that many Democrats were upset by Sen. John Kerry’s (D-Mass.) loss to President Bush in the 2004 election, when some Democrats made  allegations of vote manipulation in Ohio, the state that ultimately decided the race. Speculation about Election-Day violence has spread on the Internet They have  seen it on the Internet  and they have  heard that there  could be civil unrest depending on the outcome of . Police  are prepared to respond in the case of some sort of unrest or some sort of incident.     Many police departments have policies  prohibiting public discussion of security plans. Shelton, of the NAACP, said he understands the need for police to maintain order. But he is also concerned that some  political partisans may point their finger at black voters as potential troublemakers because the Democratic nominee is black. I would be concerned with how  the news media and their hype , making this a racial race for the Whitehouse.

Shelton said any racial or ethnic group would get angry if they felt disenfranchised because of voting irregularities. Hmmm!  And that leaves one to wonder if voting is indeed manipulated.

 

 

Add a Comment

I just came back from Canada and I don’t understand what is going on. It seems everyone I spoke with was as unhappy with what was going on in politics as many in the U.S.Tuesday October 14 is Canada's elections they have a guy running called Dion he is with the liberal party and I call him the Canadian Obama. Someone who you can't afford to have in office because he thinks people have magic wallets, every time you open it money comes out. No one knew who they would vote for most said they wouldn’t vote.  Iceland is experiencing big takeovers of family run business that are not able to keep afloat because of banking freeze. Who’s buying out all of this business?  The same greedy types responsible for the Wall Street crisis.  I love watching news in other countries I hear how the U.S. is referred to   when they report, and right now it the reporting is the crumbling of Wall Street.  It seems no country is immune to the shift of wealth and Government corruption that is going on.

 

10 Comments | Add a Comment

Girl Robot.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1
777667.ece

 

 

2 Comments | Add a Comment

This bailout just extends the agony. Let the markets suffer, and to purge ALL those malinvestment.

 

41 University of Chicago economists, including 2 Nobel Laureates sign the letter saying the bailout is a bad idea. This list is a joke the Senate version takes a bad idea and hangs a bunch of sweeteners on it to try to pick up votes. HUH? Taxpayers should not carry the burden of other people’s irresponsible decision to make debts they cannot pay.

 

Any bailout that includes paying for people defaulting on their mortgages is unacceptable.
The people of the United States have no obligation to save those who made debts irresponsibly.

 

      Oh great, now they attached tax cuts to the bill in an effort to get it passed. They think the way to pay for a 700 billion dollar bailout is through tax cuts? It merely adds insult to injury. The bailout flies in the face of the fundamental principals that built this economy. We should let the market work! Oh Well, So mad have a headache now. Gotta jet and cover that bad check with another!

 

3 Comments | Add a Comment

Here's the quick list of the senators who voted NO on bailout/economic rescue.

 

 

Allard (R)
Barasso  (R)
Brownback  (R)
Bunning (R)
Cantwell (D)
Cochran (R)
Crapo (R)
DeMint (R)
Dole (R)
Dorgan (D)
Enzi (R)
Feingold (D) 
Inhofe (R)
Johnson (D)
Landrieu (D)
Nelson (FL) (D)
Roberts (R)
Sanders (I)
Sessions (R)
Shelby (R)
Stabenow (D)
Tester (D)
Vitter (R)
Wicker (R)
Wyden (D)

 

 

And here's the complete Senate roll call vote. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), who is recovering from a brain tumor, was the only senator who did not vote.

 

 

3 Comments | Add a Comment

The balance of power is shifting to the East as China and India.

It is easy to dismiss such dreams as bubble-economy hubris -- until you take into account the audacious goals Shanghai already has achieved. Since 1990, when the city still seemed caught in a socialist time warp

Here, Indians are playing invaluable roles in the global innovation chain. Motorola, Hewlett-Packard Cisco Systems and other tech giants now rely on their Indian teams to devise software platforms and dazzling multimedia features for next-generation devices.

China and India. Still relatively poor nations been watched with such a mixture of awe, opportunism. The postwar era witnessed economic miracles in Japan and South Korea. But neither was populous enough to power worldwide growth or change the game in a complete spectrum of industries. China and India, by contrast, possess the weight and dynamism to transform the 21st-century global economy. The closest parallel to their emergence is the saga of 19th-century America, a huge continental economy with a young, driven workforce that grabbed the lead in agriculture, apparel, and the high technologies of the era, such as steam engines, the telegraph, and electric lights.

But in a way, even America's rise falls short in comparison to what's happening now.

In the coming decades, China and India will disrupt workforces, industries, companies, and markets in ways that we can barely begin to imagine. The upheaval will test America's commitment to the global trade system, and shake its confidence. In the 19th century, Europe went through a similar trauma when it realized a new giant -- the U.S. -- had arrived. "It is up to America to manage its own expectation of China and India as either a threat or opportunity.  It’s been said that America should be as open-minded as Europe was 100 years ago." How these Asian giants integrate with the rest of the world will largely shape the 21st-century global economy.

I’ve seen this day coming for a long time America stepping down, a country that grew strong with the dreams of Americans, Capitalism the social system which now exists in all countries of the world. Under this system, the means for producing and distributing goods (the land, factories, technology, transport system etc) are owned by a small minority of people. Has our Government for years desired the controll of all America stands for? I believe this was decided and planned as far back as planed 30 years ago, and has come forward with 911.

Capitalism = free market ,I feel we’ve lost that , and we now will have A World Socialist Movement  which  consists of people who have organized themselves democratically with one objective: to bring about a complete change in world society. A call for socialism? Can we stop this bailout? What does this bailout mean? Do we vote for socialism, or do we hang strong and vote for someone who thinks the bailout a bad idea? Do we even have a choice? Knowing if we do not bail out we will see hardships that none have ever seen? The years to come I think you will see us move to a new economy , a World Socialist, movement a step back from the Great country we were. If you do nothing more you must say no to this bailout you must be heard, Government is just buying time with this bailout for themselvese,our economy will get worse.  

2 Comments | Add a Comment

The balance of power is shifting to the East as China and India.

It is easy to dismiss such dreams as bubble-economy hubris -- until you take into account the audacious goals Shanghai already has achieved. Since 1990, when the city still seemed caught in a socialist time warp

Here, Indians are playing invaluable roles in the global innovation chain. Motorola, Hewlett-Packard Cisco Systems and other tech giants now rely on their Indian teams to devise software platforms and dazzling multimedia features for next-generation devices.

China and India. Still relatively poor nations been watched with such a mixture of awe, opportunism. The postwar era witnessed economic miracles in Japan and South Korea. But neither was populous enough to power worldwide growth or change the game in a complete spectrum of industries. China and India, by contrast, possess the weight and dynamism to transform the 21st-century global economy. The closest parallel to their emergence is the saga of 19th-century America, a huge continental economy with a young, driven workforce that grabbed the lead in agriculture, apparel, and the high technologies of the era, such as steam engines, the telegraph, and electric lights.

But in a way, even America's rise falls short in comparison to what's happening now.

In the coming decades, China and India will disrupt workforces, industries, companies, and markets in ways that we can barely begin to imagine. The upheaval will test America's commitment to the global trade system, and shake its confidence. In the 19th century, Europe went through a similar trauma when it realized a new giant -- the U.S. -- had arrived. "It is up to America to manage its own expectation of China and India as either a threat or opportunity.  It’s been said that America should be as open-minded as Europe was 100 years ago." How these Asian giants integrate with the rest of the world will largely shape the 21st-century global economy.

I’ve seen this day coming for a long time America stepping down, a country that grew strong with the dreams of Americans, Capitalism the social system which now exists in all countries of the world. Under this system, the means for producing and distributing goods (the land, factories, technology, transport system etc) are owned by a small minority of people. Has our Government for years desired the controll of all America stands for? I believe this was decided and planned as far back as planed 30 years ago, and has come forward with 911.

Capitalism = free market ,I feel we’ve lost that , and we now will have A World Socialist Movement  which  consists of people who have organized themselves democratically with one objective: to bring about a complete change in world society. A call for socialism? Can we stop this bailout? What does this bailout mean? Do we vote for socialism, or do we hang strong and vote for someone who thinks the bailout a bad idea? Do we even have a choice? Knowing if we do not bail out we will see hardships that none have ever seen? The years to come I think you will see us move to a new economy , a World Socialist, movement a step back from the Great country we were. If you do nothing more you must say no to this bailout you must be heard, Government is just buying time with this bailout for themselvese,our economy will get worse.  

4 Comments | Add a Comment

If this bill passes then welcome to the United States of Socialism. If you’re not ready to be heard then you should be. Keep calling writing and E-mailing you disgust of Washington.

17 Comments | Add a Comment


Judgenot

I've been in Texas most of my life,I love all Texas has to offer,Lakes ,Oceans,And lots to see.

Member Since: 1/29/2007