MyFox
 

TexasTruBlu's Blog

by TexasTruBlu from Southern Denton Co

Last Post 2 hours Ago


It would seem that Hillary Clinton let the cat out of the bag by trying to get Congress to pass a fuel tax holiday. While the margin of profit that oil companies make has been pretty consistent at around 8%. Granted that's better than some companies, but much less than say, Google, which had a 25% profit. To quote from CNN-which is not usually an apologist for big oil companies-

"...Even though many oil companies are reporting record profits, many people forget just how expensive it is for energy companies to engage in the oil business.

The average net profit margin for the S&P Energy sector, according to figures from Thomson Baseline, is 9.7%. The average for the S&P 500 is 8.5%. So yes, energy companies are more profitable than many others...but not by an inordinate amount.

Google, for example, reported a net profit margin of 25% in its most recent quarter. Should we have an online advertising windfall profit tax?..."

CNN Money April 29, 2008

So exactly which entities have the most to lose if gas taxes are cut? Not the oil companies, their taxes are paid before it hits the pump. But local taxing umbrellas such as counties, states and even the federal government have a great deal to lose if such a tax holiday were passed. The Obama camp is trying to rally union opposition by citing the possibility of losing construction jobs. But then again, is this real shrinkage of the domestic job market, or will it give construction companies the incentive to stop hiring people who are not here legally? And when it comes to tax dollars going into Washington D.C. , Texans are only getting about seventy five cents or so for every dollar we send. So where's the rest of the money? We could go into the scenario from "It's a Wonderful Life" where the function of the savings and loan is explained, but the simply matter is that the money Texans don't get back in the form of projects is political payola for things like ethanol support subsidies, pet projects and celebrity endorsed programs which due to their cost only help the already wealthy. In short, while there's a noticeable reluctance to address the issue, the federal government, state governments and local towns and cities are reaping a bountiful harvest of sales taxes that become exponentially higher when they are based on per dollar sales. Everyone wins, except the consumer. Maybe someone should read them the story about the Goose that Laid the Golden Egg before all of our gooses are cooked

Update: If you think that this is merely a political gambit, you may be right. But if you think that neither the Republicans nor Democrats have come out for higher taxes as a means of forcing citizens into a more fuel concious mode, then think again. Read this blog, but then be sure to scroll down to the comments where some die hard Democrats urge the RAISING of federal fuel taxes in order to fund alternative fuels. I have already outlined the political boondoggle that is corn based ethanol. Imagine what will happen to those funds once the other fringe groups get their hooks into a candidate. I have no problem with subsidies for solar, thermal or even biofuel, but there are groups out there with tangential programs that are not economically feasible. But without someone demanding accountability, there will be  good money thrown after bad.

Read this blog and comments

12 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 12
Page 1 of 1
superman read my blog view my photos
May 3, 2008 | 2:19 PM

CLICK ON EACH FOR LOCAL PRICES

chardoney read my blog view my photos
May 3, 2008 | 5:06 PM

So I hear, don't know why she wants to that, the Dems have been yipping about NEEDING higher oil prices since the -70's... so we won't use so much, don't ya know.

cbfan read my blog
May 3, 2008 | 5:24 PM

Truthfully Chard, I've never heard any Democratic or Republican politician say we need higher gas prices. Perhaps, the leftist radicals have said that kinda stuff.

Neither party should be judged by their far left or far right radicals.

TexasTruBlu read my blog view my photos
May 3, 2008 | 6:55 PM

http://talkingtransportation.blogspot.com/2006/04/why-w
e-need-higher-gasoline-prices.html
There have been a collection of pundits that supported higher fuel prices for a variety of reasons. Some of them thought it would force Congress to rescind the ban on ANWR development. Others thought it would force people into a wide range of conservation. But I guess it's not expensive enough yet, because I still see folks sitting in drive throughs in Tahoes and Hummers running their engines with the A/C cranked.

cbfan read my blog
May 3, 2008 | 9:43 PM

Not me TTB; when gas first hit $3 per gallon, I got rid of my Jeep and bought a little Toyota that gets 39 mpg. I also drive far fewer miles; driving only when truly necessary.

acoolone read my blog view my photos
May 4, 2008 | 2:07 AM

The real question is this; does the government have a right to tell companies how much profit they can make? That answer should always be NO. Unless you want to live in a socialist country. Then we can tell J C Pennies, Jack In the Box, Starbucks etc how much to charge and how much money they can make.
But then you have to ask this question, is the government going to help pay for any lose that company may occur? This is just another way the left in this country can control everything and turn this country into a socialist state.

cyrusmartin read my blog view my photos
May 4, 2008 | 2:21 PM

So does this mean that some people here just might agree with Obama on something?

*gasp*

God forbid!


heh

;)

-Cy

TexasTruBlu read my blog view my photos
May 4, 2008 | 6:00 PM

Here is the deal that bugs me. It's really easy to make Big Oil, or Big Pharm or whatever industry in in the eye of the media into a villain for making profits. So how come nobody's upset about Bill Gates making billions? How come nobody cares Mark Cuban can play at being an owner because he leveraged a dot com into a major company? We either have to tax ALL OF THEM, or NONE of THEM. So make your choices folks and then see if capital runs away from creating jobs here. As for the feds, they dont' care, they will spend the money with or without our blessings.

UCantHandleThisTruth read my blog
May 4, 2008 | 7:14 PM

Class warfare is what the losers need to keep that anger of the ignorant fueled up

pleasechooseanother read my blog view my photos
May 5, 2008 | 3:34 AM

I feel sorry for anyone who doesn’t know that you can move Google’s 25% or the Oil company’s 8% anywhere along a line between 100% and -0% just by tweaking the numbers, I think that is called cooking the books ? I believe they wake to a new world every morning, just like the surprised employees at Enron . However, it sounds to me like Google needs some of Exxon’s top guns to cross over and help lower their tax base.

pleasechooseanother read my blog view my photos
May 5, 2008 | 3:35 AM

I feel sorry for anyone who doesn’t know that you can move Google’s 25% or the Oil company’s 8% anywhere along a line between 100% and -0% just by tweaking the numbers, I think that is called cooking the books ? I believe they wake to a new world every morning, just like the surprised employees at Enron . However, it sounds to me like Google needs some of Exxon’s top guns to cross over and help lower their tax base.

pleasechooseanother read my blog view my photos
May 5, 2008 | 3:37 AM

I hate it when that happens.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




TexasTruBlu

I am a teacher, a mother and wife and I like to think I am a pretty good citizen. I read ALOT. I also write a good deal on various blogs. I appreciate a chance to respond to what we see in the news. I think that by posting our opinions we can probably find that everyone is more alike than we are willing to admit. Face it, people just like to argue. I would also like to say how much I appreciate having a forum for my views.

Member Since: 7/25/2006