MyFox
 

39 and Holding

by amvet from Burnet, Texas

Last Post 4 days, 15 hours Ago


I received this from a friend who is also a writer, and am passing it along for your information.  As those who follow my blogs are aware, I am an Independent Moderate so this is not a negative piece, just an opinion of one who has the credentials to offer it.

Amvet

Subject: Fwd: Jack Wheeler
 
 
 
 Jack Wheeler is a brilliant man who was the author of
Regan's strategy to break the back of the Soviet Union with
the star wars race and expose their inner weakness.  For years
he wrote a weekly intelligence update that was extremely
interesting and well structured and informed.  He
consults(ed) with several mega corporations on global trends
and the future, etc.  I think he is in semi-retirement now.  He is
a true patriot with a no-nonsense approach to everything.  He
is also a somewhat well known mountain climber and adventurer.
 
 
Subject: Dr. Jack Wheeler Regarding Obama
 
Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
 
 The O-man, Barack Hussein Obama, is an eloquently tailored
empty suit. No resume, no accomplishments, no experience, no original
ideas, no understanding of how the economy works, no understanding of
how the world works, nothing but abstract empty rhetoric devoid
of real substance.
 
He has no real identity. He is half-white, which he rejects. The rest of him
is mostly Arab, which he hides but is disclosed by his non-African, Arabic
surname and his Arabic first and middle names as a way to triply proclaim
his Arabic parentage to people in Kenya . Only a small part of him is
African Black from his Luo grandmother, which he pretends he "is"
exclusively.
 
What he isn't -- not a genetic drop of -- is 'African-American,' the
descendant
of enslaved Africans brought to America chained in slave ships. He hasn't a
single ancestor who was a slave. Instead, his Arab ancestors were slave
owners. Slave-trading was the main Arab business in East Africa for
centuries until the British ended it.
 
Let that sink in: Obama is not the descendant of slaves, he is the
descendant of slave owners. Thus he makes the perfect Liberal Messiah.
 
It's something even Hillary doesn't understand -- how some complete neophyte
came out of the blue and stole the Dem nomination from her. Obamamania is
beyond politics and reason. It is a true religious cult, whose adherents
reject
Christianity yet still believe in Original Sin, transferring it from the
evil of being human to the evil of being white.
 
Thus Obama has become the white liberals' Christ, offering absolution from
the
Sin of Being White. There is no reason or logic behind it, no faults or
flaws of his
can diminish it, no arguments Hillary could make of any kind can be
effective
against it. The absurdity of Hypocrisy Clothed In Human Flesh being their
Savior is all the more cause for liberals to worship him: Credo quia
absurdum, I believe it because it is absurd.
 
 Thank heavens that the voting majority of Americans remain Christian and
are
in no desperate need of a phony savior.
 
His candidacy is ridiculous and should not be taken seriously by any free
thinking American.

The e-mail closed with the following, *Pass this on to every free thinking American you  know!*
 
 


13 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 13
Page 1 of 1
Judgenot read my blog view my photos
Aug 15, 2008 | 11:47 PM

So very well put. Bravo

WilliamLight read my blog view my photos
Aug 18, 2008 | 2:27 AM

i love how hes always saying that hes going to bring change but everything he says is bring up taxes and change to windmills for energy... none of that quilifies as good change. oh i forgot the stimulous package thats going to come out of our taxes, its like a bad loan that were going to be paying off for a long time.

Judgenot read my blog view my photos
Aug 18, 2008 | 8:44 AM

One thing Government is good for is bad loans.

westdil read my blog view my photos
Aug 18, 2008 | 3:50 PM

Jack Wheeler on McCain:

http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/3077/2/

If elected, will McCain bomb Pakistan to get Usama Bin Laden; will Obama give us a "chicken in every pot"? Who knows what these guys will do once elected. I just saw an email called "electile dysfunction" when neither candidate is a good choice.

I'm still have an open mind based on issues and am keeping my powder dry.

Next up: Is it Barack and Joe; John & Mitt?

Judgenot read my blog view my photos
Aug 18, 2008 | 5:02 PM

Honestly, I feel the American people are smarter than to vote for Obama.

Brer-Rabbit read my blog
Aug 19, 2008 | 5:05 PM

Judgenot,

I think your feelings on the smarts of the American voting public are misplaced. The American people re-elected George W. Bush; who is without doubt one of the most incompetent men to ever hold the office.

WilliamLight- As your boy Bush will leave office with the largest debt in the HISTORY OF RECORDED TIME, how exactly do you think Americans can pay down the debt?

That is the problem with you Republicans...you are so hot and heavy for "lower taxes" but can not control your spending.

Reagan? Massive debt!
Bush the First? Massive debt!
Bush W.? Biggest debt in history.


We Democrats feel it is immoral and irresponsible to pass debt to our children.

But not ol' Amvet. What does he care? He'll be dead.

Judgenot read my blog view my photos
Aug 19, 2008 | 8:45 PM

You assume Brer-Rabbit I’m a republican, I’ll forgive you for that because you are a democrat,now how does all that name calling make you feel. If I vote for anyone it’s because I believe him or her to be the best person for the job,unfortunately I don’t believe you vote the same way which to me is very sad. As far the national debt maybe you should realize what the national debt is comprised of earmarks and bad decisions, One example a $170 million earmark for the salmon industry, quietly tucked into the mammoth bill at the last minute by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA). This was tucked away in the farm bill. I’m not going to accuse the Dems or the Pubs. for wasteful earmarks both party’s are guilty, I just feel we need to look beyond party names when voting and make a intelligent choice for president.

Brer-Rabbit read my blog
Aug 20, 2008 | 8:29 AM

Judgenot,

Sorry about that. I should have written out my response better. Only my first paragraph was directed at you specificly.

The "You Repubicans" was directed at everyone on this post who gives props to the biased blatherings of Amvet. That guy posts all the time and to anyone payign attention, he is FAR from an objective independent.

Basically, I am tired of the Right's tired old "Democrats only want to raise taxes" while ignoring their debt-increasing ways.

As for earmarks, you are right on target. I saw an expose on the Salmon deal on the national news a few months back. It IS a screwed up deal. So I agree with you there.

But as for me name calling, please forgive me. I have spent the last eight years being called a "defeatist" or "Traitor" or "Weak on National Defense" because I did not fall into lock step with the Bush administration's march to this unending war.

Final point. I actually admire McCain very much. I just feel Obama will do a better job. I feel America does NOT need to "bomb..bomb...bomb..bomb Iran."

Judgenot read my blog view my photos
Aug 20, 2008 | 9:18 AM

Brer-Rabbit I truly agree, I also feel we should have never went into the middle east bombing and killing innocent people, and stating this war on terror, we would have done better to send in our finest group of the military and quietly and seek out these nasty humans who make it their religion to kill those who do not believe as they do. God bless you Brer-Rabbit and stand strong for what you believe.

mathman read my blog view my photos
Aug 20, 2008 | 9:57 PM

Basic government lecture 101: No budget is put into effect by any president. The president only PROPOSES a budget. It then goes to CONGRESS where it blossoms into something unimaginable as all those yahoos try to buy their re-election. Reagan didn't bust the budget...Congress did. Bush 1 didn't bust the budget...Congress did. W didn't bust the budget...Congress did.

Forget the president. If you want to control spending, get those idiots out of Congress. All of them. Why do you think we pay the president so much? So he can take the heat for Congress. And it seems to have worked very well judging by the uninformed responses above.

Iraq? Congress voted to go (including Hillary)
Budget? Congress added earmarks and probably 2 or 3 thousand pages to the proposed budget
Oil Shortage? Congress restricted our access to our own oil years ago and now uses the time factor to justify doing nothing.
I could go on. Just suffice it to say that Congress pulls the strings and passes the laws and regulations. No wonder they get away with it since everyone thinks it's the president.

flipnotic read my blog view my photos
Aug 27, 2008 | 6:58 PM

Go read The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder by Vincent Bugliosi and you will see just what "power" Bush has. Another good read is Against all Enemies by Richard A. Clarke. Nobody is letting Congress off the hook for being wussies. This slimeball president gets whatever he wants. If he doesn't like the way a General is handling Iraq(Abizaid and Casey) he replaces them (with folks like Patraeus. If he doesn't like U.S. Attorneys he has them fired. He lied Congress and the US into war. Go ahead and believe what you will; you can't prove the Earth is flat because over 70% of Americans know it is round.

MichaelJMcFadden read my blog
Sep 6, 2008 | 4:38 PM

"Jack Wheeler is a brilliant man who was the author of Reagans strategy to break the back of the Soviet Union with the star wars race and expose their inner weakness."

====

Quite aside from anything else...

I *thoroughly* disagree with the assessment of Reagan's "results."

The Soviet Union could clearly have simply ignored us wasting billions on Star Wars. Think about it: how would it have hurt them to ignore it? Do you think Gorbachev believed that as soon as we got it ten or twenty years down that line that we'd launch an all-out nuclear attack?

All that Star Wars did was increase the pressure from the Soviet hard-liners against a leader who was undoing decades of state mind-control and dictatorship with his liberalization program.

I believe Gorbachev probably *should* have been Times' "Entity of the Century" for bringing us away from a great likelihood of massive nuclear war. If Brezhnev, Andropov, Putin, or any of the other hard-line nuts had been in power during the Reagan years the Soviet Union would have just continued as always, stifling dissent and executing/gulagging anyone who made a noise.

Whatever we did or did not do with Star Wars would have made absolutely no difference to them: we could have had a million Star Wars programs and it wouldn't have affected them unless the US wanted to launch a nuclear attack upon them.

If we had had a Jimmy Carter as president during the 80s we might very well have seen a much more liberal and stable Soviet Union develop as a close ally, we might have been much less likely to see the ra

MichaelJMcFadden read my blog
Sep 6, 2008 | 4:39 PM

{continued...}

we might have seen far less suffering in Europe, and we might have a stable *real* democracy going over in the Soviet Union today started by a strong figurehead (Gorby) instead of one started on the weak foundations of an alcoholic politician (Yeltsin) that's fallen apart and gone back largely to "the old days" under Putin.

Soooo... :> As you can see, my analysis of Gorby/Reagan/Star Wars is a bit different than the norm. I believe that if Gorby hadn't come along we'd probably all be fried chicken by now.

A bit different, eh?

:)
Michael J. McFadden
http://encyclopedia.smokersclub.com/130.html

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




amvet

Retired volunteer disabled American veteran. Ordained Christian Minister. Great grand father, ex professional journalist, very opinionated. Independent, moderate voter. Hobbies are flying, sailing, riding my 30 plus year old 10 speed, and enjoying my 3 year old seal point Siamese cat, Oliver.

Member Since: 2/12/2007