chardoney's posts about:
Political
See all posts with this tag
"BLOCKING the Path to 9/11"
Sep 5, 2008 | 7:56 AM PST
Category:
Political
I do not expect any of the
Clinton fans or Democrat supporters to watch these clip - or to believe them, since it does not fit into the ideas & agenda surrounding the Clinton
phony "legacy". These clips were NOT created by a room full
of conservatives or Republicans. In fact, many who made the Path of 9/11 movie,
"consider themselves very left."
The trailer does address the
censorship by the Clinton Administration (Clinton himself) to remove parts of
the Path To 9/11 movie, to rewrite, remove and redo. This was Clinton's desperate and "Stalinist" like need to suppress
facts and rewrite history.
The new documentary/ movie clip
(2nd video) connects why the news media was willing to back off from Hillary
Clinton's presidential run and support Obama (which obviously, they are
doing. Were they, too, tired to covering for the Clinton's?)
Secondly, Obamas' complete
ignorance or lie, regarding the first attack against the WTC is exposed.
Hurricane Sarah
Sep 4, 2008 | 9:39 AM PST
Category:
Political
Hurricane Sarah blew into St. Louis last
night. Stronger than every imagine by the biased, now quivering liberal media.
Full of bounty, replenishment, flooding the participants at the St. Louis center
with eloquence.
Hurricane Sarah was defiant, landing hard direct hits to
the dismissive, arrogant democrats, while at the same time full of gracious
sensibilities, humor, intelligence - and most importantly -
right.
"But here's
a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I'm not going to
Washington to seek their good opinion - I'm going to Washington to serve the
people of this country. Americans expect us to go to Washington for the right
reasons, and not just to mingle with the right people. . . . . . .
I guess a small-town mayor
is sort of like a "community organizer," except that you have actual
responsibilities. I might add that in small towns, we don't quite know what to
make of a candidate who lavishes praise on working people when they are
listening, and then talks about how bitterly they cling to their religion and
guns when those people aren't listening. We tend to prefer candidates who don't
talk about us one way in Scranton and another way in San Francisco"
Yes, that was
SOME hurricane. One which will bring a breath of needed fresh air to the country!
"To deal with these challenges
the Democrats present a history making nominee for president.
History making in that
he is the most liberal, most inexperienced nominee to ever run for President.
Apparently they believe that he would match up well with the history making,
Democrat controlled Congress. History making because it's the least accomplished
and most unpopular Congress in our nation's history. "
Fred Thompson Sept. 2,
2008
Obama Must Be So Proud . . .
Sep 2, 2008 | 12:09 PM PST
Category:
Political
Anyone who
can't find a better stage name better than "P" must be a mental midget (nothing against
height challenged individuals). This less than bright bulb, decided to promote HIS leftist
candidate, Obama with what he called "Diddy-Obama Blogs" .
Here is his 'oh- so- eloquent'
slander of (yet another) woman. Does he have any respect for women or are they
just for his 'use', I wonder?
And yes, Mr.
P, there are many blacks Americans in Alaska . . . many getting very
wealth doing REAL work. A simple fact you could have discover, Mr.
P, if you were actually interested, which you of course, were not.
Or you might just be stupid?
“John you are bugging the f*** out. I don’t
even understand what planet you’re on now. This is the job to be the leader of
the free world. No disrespect, I love ya, I want you to live to 110, but what
if, God forbid, you got a running mate, you become President. Alaska? ALASKA?
ALASKA? ALASKA? Come on, man. I don’t even know if there are any black people in
Alaska. John, come on. Sarah [Palin]? What in the hell? ALASKA? You’re bugging
the f*** out. Sarah Palin, you ain’t ready to be vice president. ALASKA
MOTHERF***ER? What is the reality in Alaska? There aren’t even any crackheads in
Alaska. There aren’t no black people in Alaska.”
The First Woman
Aug 30, 2008 | 10:30 AM PST
Category:
Political
This post has been edited by an administrator
There was a lot of chatter the other day, about the 'historicness' of the Obama nomination. The chatter of course, was mostly from the Democrats. I do understand some of the 'historicness', although I also see it as over done.
After all, Obama is a man of mixed race. Referring to him as an "Africa-American" is completely incorrect, unless you want to disregard the white side of his family. He's therefore the first mixed race Presidential candidate. And so what? We have had Ms. Condi Rice as the first black woman Secretary of State. And then there's Clarence Thomas, a very accomplished, intelligent, respected man on the Supreme Court, who happens to be black. Their PROBLEM is that they aren't liberal Democrat. So they get virtually ignored or dissed by liberals.....as no big "first" in their eyes.
Now we have Gov. Sarah Palin, the first women VP nominee on the Republican side. And what does she receive from these "open minded" liberals Democrats? Vile comments on her gender, her incompetence, mocking her looks, her hair, her family, etc. Why? Because she isn't an anti-abortion supporting, war hating, Bush hating liberal Democrat.
And why have Republicans & conservatives come around to her nomination so quickly? Because she's a woman? Because she's a "first"?! NO. Because she's a conservative. We look at ideology, thoughts, accomplishments based on conservatives principles. We don't get in a twitter about race, gender, and nationality. And after all, that is what Martin Luther King said we needed - the day we looked "at a man's character, and not his skin color".
The great Barry Barrack Hussein
Obama has been offended, yet again. So offended that he's asked the U.S.
Justice Department come to his rescue. A 527 group has made a political ad
which depicts the close connections between the unrepentant, American
terrorist, William Ayers, and Barry Barrack Hussein Obama. Obama wrote a
letter to the Justice Department stating that "the primary donor to
this 527, the Texas millionaire, be prosecuted"
Here is part of his letter:
"We reiterate our request that the Department of Justice
fulfill its commitment to take prompt action to investigate and to prosecute the
American issues Project, and we further request that the Department of Justice
investigate and prosecute Howard (sic) Simmons for a knowing and willful
violation of the individual aggregate contribution limits,". I wonder if he also asked them to investigate his donor and
benefactor, George 'richer than god', Sorros? Clearly, Obama is extreme afraid
of his close ties to his friend and homegrown, communist
terrorist, Ayers, being more fully exposed.
Prosecuted because the great Obam
doesn't like what's being said? He's anti-free speech? Because he's OFFENDED? Is this the
American Obama wants? Is this the American "change" he pontificates about?
Yes, it IS.
Unfortunately for
Obama, he doesn't have much of a chance that his self
servicing 'demand' will be recognized.
And what a cry baby . . . .
Let freedom ring . . . at
least a while longer.
The Conservative Majority
Aug 27, 2008 | 11:28 AM PST
Category:
Political
The Battleground Poll is
supposedly one of in all of the public opinion polls. It is also different, in
that it is truely considered "bipartisan". They released their latest results on
August 20th.
"The results of their polling
- Sixty (60%) percent of Americans considered themselves
conservative. Does this mean that most Americans do not
know what "conservative" means? No: The question specifically provides an out to
people who are not sure about their ideology; it provides an out to people who
want to be considered "moderate." Americans reject those choices. They
overwhelmingly define themselves as "conservative."
This is a huge political story
- except that it is not "new" at all.
Look at the thirteen
Battleground Poll results over the last six years, and how do Americans answer
that very question? Here are the percentages of Americans in those polls who
call themselves "conservative":
June 2002: 59% (June 2002 poll), 59%
(September 2003 poll), 61% (April 2004 poll), 59% (June 2004 poll), 60%
(September 2004 poll), 61% (October 2005 poll), 59% (March 2006), 61% (October
2006), 59% (January 2007), 63% (July 2007), 58% (December 2007), 63% (May 2008),
and now 60% (August 2008.)
The percentage of Americans
who define themselves as "somewhat liberal" or "very liberal" has always
been puny. In thirteen straight polls, this percentage has never been
higher than 38% (June 2004) and it has usually been much
lower.
What does this mean in
electoral politics? If conservative presidential candidates simply got all the
conservative votes - if virtually all moderate voters, uncommitted voters, and
liberal voters went for the liberal candidate - then the conservative candidates
would win a landslide bigger than Ronald Reagan in 1988.
Have you ever wondered
why liberals like Obama never call themselves liberals? Maybe their advisers
have read the Battleground Poll internals"
Bruce Walker, of The
America Thinker.
Rules for Radical Obamas'
Aug 26, 2008 | 5:50 PM PST
Category:
Political
This post has been edited by an administrator
Michelle Obama's used the phrase, “The
world as it is” and “The world as it should be?” which she was quoting from her
husband, Barrack Hussein Obama. But, theses 'lines' actually came from a book by Saul
Alinsky’s, Rules for Radicals.
"Barack stood up that day," talking
about a visit to Chicago neighborhoods, "and spoke words that have stayed with
me ever since. He talked about “The world as it is” and
“The world as it should be..."
And, "All of us driven
by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do – that we have an
obligation to fight for the world as it should
be."
Here’s the excerpt from Chapter 2 of Saul Alinsky’s book, Rules for
Radicals:
"The means-and-ends moralists,
constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against
the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In
fact, they are passive — but real — allies of the Haves…The most unethical of
all means is the non-use of any means... The standards of judgment must be
rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is,
not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should
be."
Saul Alinsky’s IS A COMMUNIST. Evidenlty, another one of Obama's noted communists mentors.
Cardinal Justin F.
Rigali, chairman of the U.S. Bishops' Committee on Pro-Life Activities, and
Bishop William E. Lori, chairman of the U.S. Bishops' Committee on Doctrine,
have issued the following statement address Democrat Nancy Pelosi asinine PRO
abortion state last Suday:
"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi misrepresented the history and nature of the authentic teaching of
the Catholic Church against abortion.
In fact, the Catholic Church
teaches, "Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil
of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and
remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed
either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law."
In the Middle Ages,
uninformed and inadequate theories about embryology led some theologians
to speculate that specifically human life capable of receiving an immortal soul
may not exist until a few weeks into pregnancy. .... the Church's moral
teaching never justified or permitted abortion at any stage of
development."
Oh my
goodness!, Speaker Nancy! We heard you say you STUDIED the Catholic teaching on
abortion for YEARS (being a self proclaimed Catholic). Did you miss what they taught . . . did you lie? Or did you
just not care if you lied? For, it seems you were completely and totally WRONG.
In Obama's World
Aug 19, 2008 | 9:38 AM PST
Category:
Political
Warren to
Obama- "Does evil exist, and if so, do we ignore it, do we negotiate
with it, do we contain it, or do we defeat it?"
So the great Obama's answer, was to find "evil" on the streets
of the United States. Not in Iran, not Cuba or China. Not al qaeda, not radical, murdering islamic terrorist,
not the evil men who flew into the Twin Towers . . . but the U.S. is the big
offender in Obama's world.
He continued by saying he saw evil from parents who "viciously abuse their children".
Yet this same great thinker doesn't see the EVIL he
perpetrates on innocent, human life by his radical abortion views. Condemning a
baby who survived a botched abortion to tossed aside and left to die, is
acceptable in the Obama World. Abortion is accepted; partial birth abortion
(sucking the brain out of a living baby) is acceptable. What is more viciously
abusive than that, pray tell?
But no, the great Obama does
not view that as the very definition of evil.
As he stumble for a thought,
he added that we Americans will not be able to eradicate evil from the
world. Well, of course, not Not with your attitude, Barrack Hussein Obama.
Abandoning the war against terror (or any other war) is certainly NO victory,
now is it.
Then he bashes American
again by saying we need "humility in confronting evil".
Humility? Name ONE war, Sen. Obama, that was WON BY HUMILITY.
Strength wins. The greater force always WINS. It always has! Not humility . .
. and certainly not surrendering.
You do not apologize to
"evil." You fight it; you defeat it. But to defeat, you must first be able to
recognize what it is. Obama is also sadly lack in the recognition department. The
kindest thing I can say about Obama is that he's ignorant. I wouldn't want to
have to count on him defending children, and certainly not the ones who survive
a botched abortion. Nor would I count on him defending my country against
terrorist, illegals or a swarm of gnats.
He'd negotiate and
apologize for how badly America is "perceived" in his Obama world.
"O-Force One"
Aug 8, 2008 | 7:33 AM PST
Category:
Political
Audacity of Arrogance Tour continues . . . . .
Sen. Obama wasn't satisfied with
having an ordinary ole American flag painted on the tail of his huge, gasoline
guzzling private 757 jet, which hauls him from worship stop, to worship stop.
So, he had it removed . And what did he put in place of the ordinary American
flag? A BIG "O", to
honor himself.
This little 'refurbishment's only cost $500,000 and in his
world, I'm sure that's a small sum to promote someone of his stature,
after all.
The airplane has been
dubbed, "O-Force One".
But he didn't stop with
that. Inside his lush private 757, on the back of Barack Hussein Obama's
seat, it reads - "Obama '08 PRESIDENT".
Obama Defines Sin
Aug 6, 2008 | 9:46 AM PST
Category:
Political
In March of 2004, a religion
reporter for the Chicago Sun-Times, columnist Cathleen
Falsani, met with Sen. Barack Hussein Obama in Chicago for an
interview. In the
interview she asked Obama if he believed in "sin" and to "define it". Barack's
answer was, sin is "being out of alignment with my
(personal) values".
Jonah Goldberg of USA Today, wrote,
"For the record,
sin isn't being out of alignment with your own values (if it were, Hannibal
Lecter wouldn't be a sinner because his values hold that it's OK to eat people)
nor is it being out of alignment with Obama's — unless
he really is our Savior." I completely agree with Mr.
Goldberg's assessment. This statement from Obama is another spotlight into his
soul. I find it almost inconceivable to believe any Christian could make such a
ridiculous statement. . . any Christian would have to know that sin
IS whatever God Himself calls sin - NOT our own
personal evaluations which will negate the will and mandate of
God. In fact, what
Obama said reflects how any, and most unbelievers, would define
"sin".
This has little to do with
his candidacy for President since his 'followers' have little concerns regarding 'religion', but it does show the mental vacuous and the
"audacity of ignorance" of this man.
