romofan's Blog

I dont think it really matters. I don't like it when someone places a game on a win or lose plane over one play. If a team plays lousy for 59 minutes, that one play is not what won or lost the game.

What game are you referring too. It would help.

Probably refering to the Packers game. I keep rewinding that play over and over, it's really a debatable call. Just about all the commentators agree that it wasn't pass interference cause he did look back. This is refering to the second penalty.

The reciever slowed down a bit to adjust to the ball while the defender looked back for just a sec to see where the ball was. I'm not the only one saying this. I'm a big NFL Network and Espn fan. I watch their clips too.

Either way, it's over and if they meet again, hopefully they are both at full strength, that way everyone is satisfied with the results.

All the commentators were wrong. If you watch the field level camera angle you can see the profile of his face in the helmet...there is no way he could be looking back. He had just turned his head back to forward before the collision.

It sucks when a referee might be responsible for the final outcome (like Monday night), but it is not the referee's fault the game was close enough for one or two bad calls to decide the game.

It would have been nice if Favre had stayed in the game, it looked like it was going to be a much bigger win for the Cowboys. It was like they didn't know how to defend against the back up QB.

I agree with graywolf and scotty. That was indeed pass interference and if Favre had played, the packers would have gotten crushed worst.