MyFox
 

tdelatte's Blog

by tdelatte from Dallas

Last Post 73 days, 7 hours Ago


Four years ago today I voted for my first Republican.
 
Despite my usual tendencies toward the Democratic party, I was given the choice between Republican Bobby Jindal and Democrat Kathleen Blanco for Louisiana governor in 2003 and I chose Jindal based on all the newspaper stories I had written on the two. I don't normally side with the Republicans. I usually agree with the ideals of the Democrats. But in this case, Jindal seemed to have the ambition and goals that I thought were essential for the job. He seemed like someone who could bring hope to the state.

Unfortunately, the rest of the state didn't agree with me then. Even my family members (who often equate me with the liberal media and call me a tree hugging hippie) thought I was crazy for liking Jindal over Blanco. What? How could that be? My parent are Bush supporters. But Blanco was the good ole boy (er... girl) of the day.

Today I think the state of Louisiana finally wised up to gave Jindal a chance. He won his seat as governor without much competition and without a runoff. Louisiana celebrates a Republican governor. I celebrate the future of Louisiana. I have hope for the state I grew up in under the leadership of Bobby Jindal.

Many of you Republicans on this board may argue I've finally wised up. I assure you I still lean left. I guess for me it just reinforces my belief that political parties aren't the end of discussion. I think there are times when political parties mean nothing and you have to vote for the best person for the job.

Does anyone out there agree?

Am I the lone blogger who thinks the separation between Democrats and Republicans isn't has wide as we make it out to be?

8 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 8
Page 1 of 1
Marks read my blog view my photos
Oct 21, 2007 | 9:42 AM

Tracy, I don't doubt the state would have been better off had Mr. (Gov.-elect) Jindal been elected four years ago.

Louisiana has one of the weirdest election schemes in the nation, with the top 2 vote getters (regardless of party) placed on the runoff one month later, unless one of the candidates reaches the magic 50 percent + 1 plateau as Jindal did. I think this scheme actually leads a voter in the state, as well as the candidates themselves, to consider positions and person, as opposed to party affiliation.

In many ways, the party separation is self-imposed. While I happen to lean right (okay, perhaps “lean” is not a valid operating word), I make it a point to read, watch, and consider candidates based on positions and character, giving less credence to party affiliation. I have voted for Democrats before (not many), as there have been times when the Democrat had a better vision or character than the Republican running.

At any rate, regarding Jindal’s win yesterday, better late than never. Congratulations, Louisiana, for transcending both race and party.

furbie read my blog view my photos
Oct 21, 2007 | 12:16 PM

The seperation of Democrats and Republicans is now measured in dollars and cents - not dollars and sense, like the old days !

Ask not what your country can do for you, but what can you come with for my campaign !!!!

Money - money - money ! Synomym for all politicans !

hillsborohillbilly read my blog view my photos
Oct 21, 2007 | 2:43 PM

Tracey , there is no such thing as a "lone blogger" . there are bloggers who don't join in and bloggers that put themself out there .

but your assertion that the dems&reps seperation isn't as wide as we make it out to be is correct . certainly we should vote for the best person , regardless of party affiliation, that's the smart thing to do .

but , unfortunately ,the fly in that ointment is that politicians now don't represent government of the people , for the people . too much special interest and money making schemes to worry about what the people want , some part of that comes from life time politicians greasing the wheels

cjl1618 read my blog view my photos
Oct 21, 2007 | 3:00 PM

We as a society MUST start making our voting decisions based on the person not the party. Toeing the party line is tearing the nation apart.

If we don't let our elected officials know that we are tired of the corruption that occurs with so much money and power in so few hands, then it will never change.

I for one, refuse to believe that no democrat can have a good idea, and feel the same for republicans. Thing is, if you watch our political process at work, or listen to the bull that comes out of the party leaders mouths, you quickly realize that the party is everything.

The good of the country is relegated to some far off idea rather than being the focus of our elected officials work.

ProudAmerican read my blog view my photos
Oct 22, 2007 | 6:15 PM

I vote for the person who will do the best job for my area and the country, that's usually Republican.
Democrates are all for social services which cost every tax payer hard earned money so the lazy bums can continue to sit on theirs.
I may vote Democrate again if one can show they really care about this country and the LEGAL citizens. That will never happen.

chardoney read my blog view my photos
Oct 22, 2007 | 7:21 PM

Democrats are the socialist, striving to supply more and more government entitlements for individuals unwilling to work for what they think they should have. Convincing people their lives should be 'fair', as decided by government.

By in large, Republicans believe individuals have responsibility for their own lives - freedom to strive, freedom to make work, freedom to make choices. Freedom of individuals to succeed or fail. And the 'helping hands' coming from the private sector to help those in need, NOT government.

Can't remember the last Dem I voted for.

DallasDave read my blog
Oct 22, 2007 | 9:30 PM

You are right on the Democrat description...but way, way off on the Republican:

Republicans are the fascists, striving to supply more and more government entitlements for businesses unwilling to work for what they think they should have. Convincing people their lives should be 'fair', as decided by government.

DallasDave read my blog
Oct 22, 2007 | 9:36 PM

TD,

Republican, Democrat...they are just words that have been twisted to be nothing more than a way to divide the people. if you step back, ignore all the idiotic jaw flapping and actually look at the voting records, you will find little to no difference between them.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




tdelatte

I am Tracy DeLatte and I am a member of the myFOXdfw.com production staff. I come to the station from Louisiana. I am a proud LSU graduate and a native of South Louisiana. But I've been happy to call Dallas my home for the past four years.

Member Since: 5/26/2006